SRI KRISHNA CHAITANYA ANTARANG RAS ASWADAN MANDIR,DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) DELHI, DELHI

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(E)’s detailed discussion has proceeded ex- parte against the assessee thereby declining it’s claim of registration as a charitable trust for want of necessary supportive evidence. Sri Krishna Chaitanya Antarang Ras Aswadan Mandir 2

Mr. Dayainder Singh Sidhu vehemently argues during the course of hearing in support of the CIT(E)’s findings that the assessee had not filed any explanation or evidence supporting it’s case and therefore, it’s instant appeal deserves to be dismissed.

We have given our thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stand and are of the considered view that since the CIT(E) has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee, possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer and the arguing counsel could not be altogether ruled out.

Faced with this situation and in the larger interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the learned CIT(E) for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at it’s own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 30/07/2025. (Avdhesh Kumar Mishra) (Satbeer Singh Godara) Accountant Member Judicial Member