TDI SHIKSHA SANSTHAN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD EXMP 2(3), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not properly present their case before the CIT(A) and restored the appeals to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The assessee was given liberty to make submissions before the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals arose from orders denying the benefit of Section 10A for Assessment Years 2020-21 and 2021-22 due to not filing Form 10A. The assessee did not appear for hearings before the CIT(A) or the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of Section 10A benefits was justified due to non-filing of Form 10A, and whether the assessee was provided adequate opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
ORDER PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM: Both these appeals of the assessee are arising out from the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dated 13.11.2024 and 12.11.2024 and relates to Assessment Years 2021-22 and 2020-21 respectively.
When this matter has been called up for hearing, nobody has appeared from the side of the assessee despite service of notice.
After perusing the order of Ld. CIT(A), it is gathered that the CPC while processing the return of income for both these years have denied benefit of section 10A to the assessee on the ground that the assessee did not file Form 10A along with return of income and, hence, the assessee is not entitled for the benefits of section 11 and 13 of the Act.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026