DELHI NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION,DELHI vs. ITO WARD EXEMPTIONS-1(3), DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had complied with the substantive provisions of filing Form 10BB within the extended due date. The delay in accepting the auditor's report was a procedural defect that was rectified later. Therefore, the benefit of Sections 11 & 12 of the Act could not be denied.
What were the facts?
The assessee, registered under Section 12A, filed its return declaring NIL income. The return was processed under Section 143(1) with an addition due to the alleged delay in filing the Audit Report in Form 10BB. The assessee argued that the report was filed within the extended due date, but there was a procedural lapse in accepting the auditor's report.
What were the issues?
Whether denial of benefit under Sections 11 & 12 of the Act is justified for a procedural lapse in filing the Audit Report in Form 10BB, when substantive compliance within the extended due date was met?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, DELHI
(A.Y. 2023-24) Delhi Neurological Association, R.No. 529, Academic Block, Department of Neuro Surgery, ...... अपीलाथ�/Appellant Darya Ganj, Delhi 110002 PAN: AAAJD-0582-E बनाम Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption 1(3), ..... �ितवादी/Respondent Delhi अपीलाथ� �ारा/Appellant by : None �ितवादी�ारा/Respondent by : Shri Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR सुनवाई क� ितिथ/ Date of hearing : 20/05/2025 घोषणा क� ितिथ/ Date of pronouncement : : 13/08/2025 आदेश/ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)- Patna (hereinafter referred to as 'the CIT(A)') dated 24.12.2024, for Assessment Year 2023-24.
Brief facts of the case as emanating from records are: The assessee is registered u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The assessee filed its return of income for the impugned assessment year declaring NIL income. The return of the assessee was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act on 29.10.2024 making addition of Rs.20,18,585/- as the mandatory Audit (AY 2023-24) Report in Form 10BB was not filed within specified due date. Aggrieved by the addition, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). Before the First Appellate Authority, the assessee explained that Audit Report in Form 10BB was furnished on 25.10.2023 i.e. within the extended period as specified by CBDT vide Circular No.16/2023 dated 18.09.2023. The CIT(A) dismissed appeal of the assessee and confirmed the addition.
Submissions made by ld. DR heard, orders of the authorities below examined. The solitary grievance raised by the assessee in appeal is denial of benefit u/s. 11 & 12 of the Act for alleged delay in filing of Audit Report in Form 10BB. The case of the assessee is that the assessee filed Audit Report in Form 10BB within the extended time along with audited balance sheet and return of income on 25.10.2023. The CBDT vide Circular No.16/2023 (supra) had extended due date for filing Form 10BB from 30.09.2023 to 31.10.2023. However, there was one procedural lapse that the Audit Report was first required to be uploaded by the Auditor on e-filing portal of the Department and then it is to be accepted by the assessee. Due to inadvertence, the assessee failed to accept that Audit Report. Inadvertent error was rectified by the assessee on 09.11.2023. The Revenue has not disputed filing of Form 10BB by the assessee. The Revenue has denied benefit of section 11 & 12 of the Act to the assessee as Form 10BB was filed beyond due date. Filing of Audit Report in prescribed Form 10BB is a mandatory requirement, which the assessee has complied with. The assessee has filed Audit Report within extended time as provided by the CBDT vide Circular No. 16/2023 however, the only flaw in filing of the said report was that the assessee was required to accept the Auditors Report uploaded by the auditor, which the assessee did on 09.11.2023 i.e. after the extended timeline. The (AY 2023-24) assessee has complied with substantive provisions in filing of Form 10BB within the due date. It is only the procedural lapse in not accepting Auditors Report uploaded by the Auditor. The benefit of section 11 & 12 of the Act cannot be denied to the assessee for the procedural defect which was rectified subsequently. The AO is directed to allow benefit of section 11 & 12 of the Act to the assessee.
In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on Wednesday the 13th day of August, 2025.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026