DIPAKSHI KHAIRA,NOIDA, UTTAR PRADESH vs. DCIT, NOIDA, UTTAR PRADESH

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1076295396(1), dated
19.05.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
2. It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from the both the parties that the learned
Assessee by Sh. Vineet Gupta, CA
Sh. Vipin, CA
Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
18.08.2025
Date of pronouncement
18.08.2025
2 | P a g e

CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone the delay of 142 days in filing of the assessee’s lower appeal instituted on 23.08.2023 against the Assessing Officer’s assessment framed on 04.03.2023, thereby holding that the same had not been explained in light of the justifiable reasons.
3. Faced with the situation, learned departmental representative could hardly dispute that the assessee had indeed filed his condonation petition before the CIT(A)/NFAC explaining all the reasons on account of circumstances beyond his control.
4. That being the case, I hereby quote Collector, Land &
Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC), settling the issue long back that all such technical aspects must make way for the cause of substantial justice, and restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for his afresh appropriate adjudication within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings.
Ordered accordingly.
6. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18th August, 2025
3 | P a g e (SATBEER SINGH GODARA)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 18th August, 2025. RK/-