EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT (INDIA) PVT LTD [SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST FOR ERSTWHILE PENTAIR VALVES AND CONTROLS INDIA PVT LTD],VADODARA vs. ASST CIT CIRCLE- 2(1)(2), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal and the Revenue's no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Emerson Process Management (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2015-16. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw its appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “K” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
Appellant by : Ms. Kinjal Patel Respondent by : Manju Thakur Date of Hearing 18.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 20.10.2023 आदेश / O R D E R
PER AMARJIT SINGH, AM:
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A), which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2015-16 .
At the outset, the ld. A.R. for the assessee brought to our notice the letter dated 12.10.2023 vide which the assessee requested to withdraw its appeals. The ld. D.R submitted that Revenue has no P a g e | Emerson Process Management (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The ACIT, Circle 2(1)(2) objection if the appeal is withdrawn. Hence, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20.10.2023
Sd/- Sd/- (KULDIP SINGH) (AMARJIT SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 20.10.2023 PS: Rohit आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 4. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / Concerned CIT विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. 6. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, सत्यावपि प्रवि //True Copy//
(Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026