ACIT CC 6(1), BKC MUMBAI vs. GNP CONSULTANCY AND SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, THANE

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

69C of the Act - Rs. 4,49,32,144/- (iii) Disallowance u/s. 37(1) - Rs. 15,75,000/- 4. The CIT(A) on further appeals gave partial relief to the assessee. Both the assessee and the Revenue are in appeal before the Tribunal Against the order of the CIT(A). The grounds raised by the Revenue and the assessee

ACIT CC 6(1), MUMBAI, BKC, MUMBAI vs. GNP CUNSULTANCY AND SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., THANE

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

69C of the Act - Rs. 4,49,32,144/- (iii) Disallowance u/s. 37(1) - Rs. 15,75,000/- 4. The CIT(A) on further appeals gave partial relief to the assessee. Both the assessee and the Revenue are in appeal before the Tribunal Against the order of the CIT(A). The grounds raised by the Revenue and the assessee

GNP CONSULTANCY AND SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

69C of the Act - Rs. 4,49,32,144/- (iii) Disallowance u/s. 37(1) - Rs. 15,75,000/- 4. The CIT(A) on further appeals gave partial relief to the assessee. Both the assessee and the Revenue are in appeal before the Tribunal Against the order of the CIT(A). The grounds raised by the Revenue and the assessee

ACIT CC -6(1), MUMBAI, BKC, MUMBAI vs. GNP CONSULTANCY AND SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., THANE

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

69C of the Act - Rs. 4,49,32,144/- (iii) Disallowance u/s. 37(1) - Rs. 15,75,000/- 4. The CIT(A) on further appeals gave partial relief to the assessee. Both the assessee and the Revenue are in appeal before the Tribunal Against the order of the CIT(A). The grounds raised by the Revenue and the assessee

L & T TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blel & T Technology Services Limited V. Acit – Circle – 2(2)(1) L & T House, N.M. Marg Room No. 545, 5Th Floor Mumbai - 400001 Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaccl4310P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri Nitesh Joshi Department Represented By : Shri Manoj Kumar

TRANSFER PRICING ISSUES 2. The Assessing Officer erred in adding the premia income on forward contracts to the total income of the Appellant without appreciating the fact that the premia income had already been offered to tax in the earlier years. 3. Without prejudice to Ground No.2, the Assessing Officer erred in adding an amount of Rs.49

EXECUTIVE TRADING CO. PVT LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. COMM OF INCOME TAX (A), NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

69C of the Act chargeable to tax at the rate of 60% in terms of Section 115BBE of the Act. Being aggrieved, the Appellant preferred appeal before the CIT(A) 5. challenging the Assessment Order, dated 29/09/2021, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Act on the ground of lack of jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings