BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

17 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 44Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai10Hyderabad5Bangalore1Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)57Section 271(1)21Section 271A21Penalty17Section 271D14Section 143(3)11Addition to Income11Section 44A7Section 271B6Section 143(1)5Exemption5Condonation of Delay4

BHADRAVATHI RAMALINGASETTY MANJUNATH SETTY,BHADRAVATHI vs. ITO WARD-1 TPS , SHIMOGA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1459/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Sri Sachin S Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Balusamy N., D.R
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271BSection 44A

44A of the Act and also got the audit report u/s 44AB of the Act and uploaded the same to e-filing portal on 31.3.2019. There was no deliberate, willful violation and absolute default on the part of the tax payer and therefore requested to drop the penalty proceedings. Further, during the course of penalty proceedings, the proprietor also submitted

RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 1301/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 271D

u/s 271D of the Act without any assessment\nproceedings in the case of the assessee is not valid and liable to be\nquashed. We order accordingly.\"\n7.\nThus, it is a pre-requisite condition for initiation of the\npenalty u/sec.271D/271E of the Act that there must be an assessment\nproceeding or proceedings arising from assessment order or any other\nproceedings

RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 1300/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 271D

u/s 271D of the Act without any assessment\nproceedings in the case of the assessee is not valid and liable to be\nquashed. We order accordingly.\n7.\nThus, it is a pre-requisite condition for initiation of the\npenalty u/sec.271D/271E of the Act that there must be an assessment\nproceeding or proceedings arising from assessment order or any other\nproceedings

RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 973/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 271D

u/s 271D of the Act without any assessment\nproceedings in the case of the assessee is not valid and liable to be\nquashed. We order accordingly.\"\n7. Thus, it is a pre-requisite condition for initiation of the\npenalty u/sec.271D/271E of the Act that there must be an assessment\nproceeding or proceedings arising from assessment order or any other\nproceedings

RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, three appeals i

ITA 972/HYD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Feb 2026AY 2019-20
For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 271D

u/s 271D of the Act without any assessment\nproceedings in the case of the assessee is not valid and liable to be\nquashed. We order accordingly.\n7.\nThus, it is a pre-requisite condition for initiation of the\npenalty u/sec.271D/271E of the Act that there must be an assessment\nproceeding or proceedings arising from assessment order or any other\nproceedings

KESIREDDY RAVINDER REDDY,HYDERABAD vs. ITO WARD-11(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1617/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nSri Mohd Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: \nDr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 143(1)Section 269SSection 271DSection 274Section 275

u/s 271D of the Act without any assessment\nproceedings in the case of the assessee is not valid and liable to be\nquashed. We order accordingly.\"\n7. Thus, it is a pre-requisite condition for initiation of the\npenalty u/sec.271D/271E of the Act that there must be an\nassessment proceeding or proceedings arising from assessment\norder or any other proceedings

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1479/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1480/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1486/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1487/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1481/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1483/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1484/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1482/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1478/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

SRINIVASAN CHANDRASEKARA CHANDILYA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is dismissed

ITA 1485/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486 & 1487/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 Srinivasan Chandrasekara Chandilya Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, K.V.Ranganathan & Co., Non-Corporate Circle-7(1), No.113/574, Ii Floor, Congress Chennai. Building, Tenampet, Chennai [Pan: Aaupc3096J]

For Appellant: Shri R.S.Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dr.Samuel Pitta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1) ( c ) for AY’s 2013-14 to 2016-17 9.0 As stated above, the facts of the case in the above mentioned ITA Nos. are same as available in ITA No.1478. Accordingly, the decision taken in ITA No.1478 Supra would squarely apply in all the above appeals. 10.0 In the result, the appeals of the assesse

RAJESH KUMAR BAID,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 5(2) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 501/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihy la-@ITA No. 501, 494 & 499/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@Assessment Year :2015-16 (u/s 271(1)(c) 271B & 271A of the Act,1961) Shri Rajesh Kumar Baid B-10, Tulsidasji Ki Bagichi Janta Colony, Jaipur 302 004 (Raj) cuke Vs. The ITO Ward 5(2) Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABZPB 7205 M vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assessee by : None jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by: Mrs. Mo

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 271B

271(1)(c) is not used in the popular sense of money received but connotes the assessable figures arrived at after accounting for all the legitimate and exemptions (Naginchand v. CIT 6 ITR 534). Further reliance is placed on the following case laws. 1. CIT v. Gates 91 ITR 467 2. Cement Distributors v.CIT 60 ITR 586 4 SHRI RAJESH