PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated ie,\nwhether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate\nparticulars of income. The Tribunal, while allowing the appeal of the assessee, has\nrelied on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in the case of CIT\nv. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAKJOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated ie,\nwhether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate\nparticulars of income. The Tribunal, while allowing the appeal of the assessee, has\nrelied on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in the case of CIT\nv. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAKJOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated ie,\nwhether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate\nparticulars of income. The Tribunal, while allowing the appeal of the assessee, has\nrelied on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in the case of CIT\nv. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACTIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated ie,\nwhether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate\nparticulars of income. The Tribunal, while allowing the appeal of the assessee, has\nrelied on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in the case of CIT\nv. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty proceedings had been initiated ie,\nwhether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate\nparticulars of income. The Tribunal, while allowing the appeal of the assessee, has\nrelied on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in the case of CIT\nv. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory

M/S KUNJ POWER PROJECTS PVT.LTD,MATHURA vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS) , KANPUR, KANPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

271-J, clause (c) or clause (d) of sub- section\n(1) or sub-section (2) of Section 272-A, sub-section (1) of\nSection 272- AA or Section 272-B or sub-section (1) or\nsub-section (1-A) of Section 272-BB or sub-section (1) of\nSection 272-BBB or clause (b) of sub-section (1

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR PATEL,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 212/Rpr/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18)

271(1)(c) and u/s 271AAB it is the AO who is to satisfy himself whether on the additions made, penalty proceedings is required to be initiated or not and also the section under which it is to be initiated. The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over