GALAXY COOP HSG SOC LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD(1)(1), THANE, THANE, MAHARAHSTRA

Section 80P(2)(d) and income from house property under Section 80P(2)(c). The CPC disallowed the claim. The Assessee

GALAXY CO OP HSG SOCIETY LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD(1)(1), THANE, THANE, MAHARAHSTRA

house property income.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "80P(2)(c)", "80P(2)(d)", "250", "143(1)", "80P(4)", "2(19)" ], "issues

PREMIUM TOWER COOP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 24(3(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS. PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

2)(d). The ld. AO had disallowed the claim after referring to the provision of Section 80P(4). The ld. CIT(A) too has confirmed the said disallowance. 4. We find that this issue has been discussed in detailed by the Tribunal in A.Y.2015-16 wherein all the contentions raised by the ld. CIT(A) has been dealt in detail including

D.S.K. MADHUBAN (WING A&B ) CO -OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 41(1)(1) , MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain

d) was denied. 5. Aggrieved by the said additions, assessee preferred appeal, but the same was dismissed by Ld.CIT(A). 6. Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(A) assessee has preferred the present appeal before me on the grounds mentioned hereinabove. DSK Madhuban (Wing A&B) Co-Op Housing Society, Mumbai a) On the facts and circumstances

D.S.K. MADHUBAN (WING A&B) CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LID,MUMBAI vs. ITO 41(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain

d) was denied. 5. Aggrieved by the said additions, assessee preferred appeal, but the same was dismissed by Ld.CIT(A). 6. Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(A) assessee has preferred the present appeal before me on the grounds mentioned hereinabove. DSK Madhuban (Wing A&B) Co-Op Housing Society, Mumbai a) On the facts and circumstances

BLUE ROSE INDUSTRIAL PREMISES CO-OP SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 42(1)(1),, MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal ITA NO

Bench: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

property of the society and to raise funds for the management, maintenance and administration of activities from the members of the society. The appellant society filed its return of income for A.Y. 2018- 19 on 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs. 2,43,620/- after claiming a deduction of Rs. 37,45,701/- u/s. 80P of the Act. Subsequently, the assessee

BLUE ROSE INDUSTRIAL PREMISES CO-OP SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 42(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal ITA NO

Bench: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

property of the society and to raise funds for the management, maintenance and administration of activities from the members of the society. The appellant society filed its return of income for A.Y. 2018- 19 on 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs. 2,43,620/- after claiming a deduction of Rs. 37,45,701/- u/s. 80P of the Act. Subsequently, the assessee