Search: house property | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11,997 results for “house property”+ Section 23clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,266 Delhi2,839 Bangalore1,026 Karnataka683 Chennai656 Kolkata443 Jaipur427 Hyderabad369 Ahmedabad340 Chandigarh259 Surat223 Pune223 Telangana168 Indore142 Amritsar99 Rajkot87 Cochin84 Raipur75 Lucknow67 Visakhapatnam67 Calcutta65 SC64 Nagpur64 Cuttack47 Patna41 Agra35 Guwahati27 Rajasthan21 Varanasi18 Jodhpur12 Allahabad11 Kerala10 Orissa8 Jabalpur7 Dehradun5 Punjab & Haryana3 Ranchi3 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3 Andhra Pradesh2 Panaji2 Gauhati2 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)80 Addition to Income71 Section 153A39 Section 14737 Section 153C32 Section 14830 Section 13225 Section 26324 Deduction24 Section 11

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3398/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

Section 23 of the Act. ‘Owner\nof the house property' is defined in Section 27 of the Act which includes

M/S. IDEAL HITECH ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 11,997 · Page 1 of 600

...

23

House Property17

ITA 3316/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

Section 143(2)Section 22Section 23Section 23(1)(a)Section 23(1)(c)Section 24Section 251(2)

house property was deemed to be the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year. In many cases, however, the actual rent received or receivable in a year exceeds the municipal valuation of the property. Sub-section (1) of section 23

MRS. RASHMI DHARIWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 11 and 12 of the appeal of the assessee are allowed accordingly

ITA 2900/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Apr 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishirashmi Dhariwal, Vs. Acit, Aashray Farms, Sub Po, Circle-23(1), Sawan Public School, Bhatti New Delhi Mines, Asola Village, New Delhi Pan:Aappd9702P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sr. FR Meena, Sr. DR

house property. Thus section 23 provides the formula for ascertaining the annual value of property in the following manner : "23

AJAY KUMAR,FATEHABAD, HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1, FATEHABAD, FATEHABAD, HARYANA

ITA 463/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

For Respondent: \nShri Suraj Bhan Nain, Advocate

Housing Board Colony,\nAmbala City-134003, Haryana\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: BZWPS3748D\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nITO,\nWard-5(5), Chandigarh\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 615 /Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19\nबनाम\nAvtar Singh\nVill: Kaimbwala, Nayagaon\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3396/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

Section 23 of the Act. ‘Owner\nof the house property' is defined in Section 27 of the Act which includes

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1 , KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3395/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

Section 23 of the Act. ‘Owner\nof the house property' is defined in Section 27 of the Act which includes

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3397/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

Section 23 of the Act. ‘Owner\nof the house property' is defined in Section 27 of the Act which includes

PAVEL GARG,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 63(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 3606/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3606/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Pavel Garg, Vs Acit, Dtj-120, 1St Floor, Jasola Tower-B, Circle-63(1), Jasola, New Delhi-110025 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aalpg2923R Assessee By : Sh. S.B. Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Hemant Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 23.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 15.02.2022

For Appellant: Sh. S.B. Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Hemant Gupta, Sr. DR

Section 23Section 23(1)(b)Section 23(1)(c)Section 23(3)(a)Section 23(4)(b)

23 which provides that where an assessee owns more than one house property in occupation used for the purpose of own residence, the annual value of any one of such house property, at his option, shall be taken to be “Nil” and the annual value of the remaining house or houses shall be determined under sub-section

KRISHNA BUILD HOME PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (HOLDING CHARGE OF ITO WARD 4(2)), JAIPUR

ITA 142/JPR/2021[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: The Learned Ao, The Reassessment Proceeding Is Illegal, Bad In Law, Without Jurisdiction & Is Based On Wrong Facts & On Change Of Opinion & In Gross Violation Of Proviso To S. 147 Of The It Act, Which Says No Action Can Be Taken M/S. Krishna Build Home Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur.

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal (CA)For Respondent: Ms Runi Pal (Addl. CIT)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 23Section 23(5)Section 24

house was ready for occupation, if the same is not kept vacant intentionally by the assessee then vacancy allowance under section 23(1)(c) would be available to the assessee. The revenue would argue that the benefit of section 23(1)(c) is available only when the property

KRISHNA BUILD HOME PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 143/JPR/2021[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: The Learned Ao, The Reassessment Proceeding Is Illegal, Bad In Law, Without Jurisdiction & Is Based On Wrong Facts & On Change Of Opinion & In Gross Violation Of Proviso To S. 147 Of The It Act, Which Says No Action Can Be Taken M/S. Krishna Build Home Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur.

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal (CA)For Respondent: Ms Runi Pal (Addl. CIT)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 23Section 23(5)Section 24

house was ready for occupation, if the same is not kept vacant intentionally by the assessee then vacancy allowance under section 23(1)(c) would be available to the assessee. The revenue would argue that the benefit of section 23(1)(c) is available only when the property

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI CENTRAL III vs. MONI KUMAR SUBBA

ITA - 499 / 2008HC Delhi30 Mar 2011

house property. Thus Section 23 provides the formula for ascertaining the annual value of property in the following manner: “Section

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. SHRI DHAVAL D. PATEL,, BARODA

In the result, the file is being restored to the Ld

ITA 1461/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Talati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

Section 23(1)(a)Section 24

house property” from various properties in different years, however, in some of the years, income from some of the properties were not shown/ shown at “Nil”. For the impugned assessment year 2013-14, the AO held that for the properties which remained vacant for throughout the year under consideration, the provisions of section 23

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 46/MUM/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 51/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 242/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

ASST CIT CC 8(4), MUMBAI vs. PHOENIX MILLS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 241/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 50/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 47/MUM/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 48/MUM/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been

THE PHOENIX MILLS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 47, MUMBAI

In the result, ground No.4 taken by assessee in assessment year

ITA 52/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

23. In the result appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2006-07 is allowed. 13 M/s. The Phoenix Mills Ltd. A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 24. In these years the assessment has been reopened within the period of four years on the very same issue of allocation of expenses towards house property income, when the said issue has already been