Search: house property | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15,156 results for “house property”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,014 Delhi3,785 Bangalore1,536 Chennai1,056 Hyderabad635 Ahmedabad572 Jaipur562 Pune532 Kolkata424 Chandigarh306 Cochin218 Indore217 Visakhapatnam124 Surat123 Rajkot120 Raipur105 Nagpur103 Amritsar96 Lucknow90 SC88 Patna83 Agra72 Cuttack51 Jodhpur50 Bombay48 Guwahati36 Dehradun26 Allahabad18 Jabalpur17 Ranchi15 Varanasi12 Panaji11 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1 T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 ANIL R. DAVE L. NAGESWARA RAO1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Addition to Income77 Search & Seizure42 Section 13240 Section 153C36 Section 54F34 Section 139(1)32 Section 6931 House Property23 Section 143(3)22 Deduction

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3398/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

House Property, the said income must be taxed under the\nhead "Income from House Property". As per its Memorandum

DLF CYBER CITY DEVELOPERS LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GURUGRAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Showing 1–20 of 15,156 · Page 1 of 758

...

22

ITA 4864/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshacit, Vs. Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Circle-1(1), Gurugram Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, Vs. Addl. Cit, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Range-I, Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Gurgaon Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. T. James Singson, CIT DR

Section 24Section 32(1)Section 801ASection 801A(4)

house property - Chargeable as (Letting of shops)- Assessee acquired leasehold rights in a property from MCGB - It constructed

DLF CYBER CITY DEVELOPERS LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GURUGRAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4865/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshacit, Vs. Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Circle-1(1), Gurugram Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, Vs. Addl. Cit, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Range-I, Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Gurgaon Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. T. James Singson, CIT DR

Section 24Section 32(1)Section 801ASection 801A(4)

house property - Chargeable as (Letting of shops)- Assessee acquired leasehold rights in a property from MCGB - It constructed

DLF CYBER CITY DEVELOPERS LTD.,GURGAON vs. ADDL. CIT, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3692/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshacit, Vs. Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Circle-1(1), Gurugram Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, Vs. Addl. Cit, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Range-I, Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Gurgaon Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. T. James Singson, CIT DR

Section 24Section 32(1)Section 801ASection 801A(4)

house property - Chargeable as (Letting of shops)- Assessee acquired leasehold rights in a property from MCGB - It constructed

DLF CYBER CITY DEVELOPERS LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GURUGRAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7407/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshacit, Vs. Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Circle-1(1), Gurugram Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, Vs. Addl. Cit, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Range-I, Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Gurgaon Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. T. James Singson, CIT DR

Section 24Section 32(1)Section 801ASection 801A(4)

house property - Chargeable as (Letting of shops)- Assessee acquired leasehold rights in a property from MCGB - It constructed

DLF CYBER CITY DEVELOPERS LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, GURUGRAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1399/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshacit, Vs. Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Circle-1(1), Gurugram Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, Vs. Addl. Cit, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Range-I, Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Gurgaon Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. T. James Singson, CIT DR

Section 24Section 32(1)Section 801ASection 801A(4)

house property - Chargeable as (Letting of shops)- Assessee acquired leasehold rights in a property from MCGB - It constructed

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GURUGRAM vs. DLF CYBER CITY DEVELOPERS LTD., GURUGRAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1451/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshacit, Vs. Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Circle-1(1), Gurugram Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H Dlf Cyber City Developers Ltd, Vs. Addl. Cit, 3Rd Floor, B-Wing, Shopping Mall Range-I, Complex, Arjun Marg, Dkf City, Gurgaon Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaccd3572H

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. T. James Singson, CIT DR

Section 24Section 32(1)Section 801ASection 801A(4)

house property - Chargeable as (Letting of shops)- Assessee acquired leasehold rights in a property from MCGB - It constructed

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3396/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

House Property, the said income must be taxed under the\nhead "Income from House Property". As per its Memorandum

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1, KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3397/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

House Property, the said income must be taxed under the\nhead "Income from House Property". As per its Memorandum

ARIHANT DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1 , KALYAN

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 3395/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

For Appellant: \nShri K. Gopal & Akhilesh Deshmukh, ARsFor Respondent: \nShri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 22Section 24

House Property, the said income must be taxed under the\nhead "Income from House Property". As per its Memorandum

RAJESH MIRAJKER,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-10(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 59/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.59/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mr.Rajesh Mirajker, V. The Dy. Commissioner- 4/1, Abu Castle, 4Th Floor, Of Income Tax, 925, Poonamallee High Road, Non-Corporate Circle-10(1), Chennai. Chennai. [Pan: Aahpm 9213 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.M.Karunakaran, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.04.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25.05.2022

For Appellant: Mr.M.Karunakaran, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.CIT

house property, but to renovate the existing house. Further, new house property was not completed

NATIONAL REALTY P. LTD.(FORMERLY NATIONAL LEASING LTD.) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5 (2) MUMBAI

ITXA/337/2015HC Bombay21 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA

house property” 2 ITXA/558/2007 1990-1991 Dt. 22/02/2006 Assessed it as “income from house property” 3 ITXA/559

NATIONAL LEASING LIMITED vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(6), MUMBAI

ITXA/685/2007HC Bombay21 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA

house property” 2 ITXA/558/2007 1990-1991 Dt. 22/02/2006 Assessed it as “income from house property” 3 ITXA/559

NATIONAL LEASING LIMITED vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(6), MUMBAI

ITXA/764/2007HC Bombay21 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA

house property” 2 ITXA/558/2007 1990-1991 Dt. 22/02/2006 Assessed it as “income from house property” 3 ITXA/559

NATIONAL REALTY P. LTD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(2)

ITXA/339/2015HC Bombay21 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA

house property” 2 ITXA/558/2007 1990-1991 Dt. 22/02/2006 Assessed it as “income from house property” 3 ITXA/559

NATIONAL REALTY P. LTD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(2)

ITXA/338/2015HC Bombay21 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA

house property” 2 ITXA/558/2007 1990-1991 Dt. 22/02/2006 Assessed it as “income from house property” 3 ITXA/559

NATIONAL REALTY P.LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(2)

ITXA/702/2015HC Bombay21 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA

house property” 2 ITXA/558/2007 1990-1991 Dt. 22/02/2006 Assessed it as “income from house property” 3 ITXA/559

MRS ALKA PANDEY,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -25(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5650/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2015-16 Mrs. Alka Pandey, Asst. Cit-25(2), Maitri – Plot No. 10, Jvpd Scheme, Kautilya Bhavan, Bkc, Vs. Vile Parle (West), Bandra (East), Mumbai-400049. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Agepp 1076 H Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Pravin Salukhe. Sr. DRFor Respondent: Mr. Aditya Maheshwari, CA

Section 143(3)Section 24

house property. The assessee preferred appeal to the house property. The assessee preferred appeal to the house

DCIT CC 4(2), MUMBAI vs. ROCKFORT ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the Cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4091/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaledcit, Cc-4(2) Vs M/S Rockfort Estate Room No. 1918, 19Th Developers Pvt Ltd Floor, Air India Bldg, 1,Leela Baug, Andheri – Nariman Point, Kurla, Mumbai – 400021. Mumbai – 400051. Pan/Gir No. : Aabcr7896K Appellant .. Respondent Co No. 72/Mum/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 4091/Mum/2019 A.Y 2014-15) M/S Rockfort Estate Vs Dcit, Cc-4(2) Developers Pvt Ltd Room No. 1918, 19Th 1, Leela Baug,Andheri Floor, Air India Bldg, – Kurla, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400051. Mumbai – 400021. Pan/Gir No. : Aabcr7896K Appellant .. Respondent Assessee By : Mr.Rahul Hakani.Ar Revenue By : Mr.S.N. Kabra.Dr Date Of Hearing 28.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 25.04.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-52

For Appellant: Mr.Rahul Hakani.ARFor Respondent: Mr.S.N. Kabra.DR

Section 14Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 22Section 23Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)

property as 'income from house property' and allow all statutory deductions under the head 'house property

ISLAND STAR MALL DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI SUBURBAN vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2251/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

house property as per “income tax site tutorial for Income from House property” placed at page