JALAJA SADHU MOOLYA,MUMBAI vs. ITO 23 (2)(3), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2008-09 Jalaja Sadhu Moolya, Income Tax Officer-23(2)(3), C/4, Block No. 51, Gokul Ashish Chs, C-10, First Floor, Room No. 107, Dr. R.P. Road, Mulund (West), Vs. Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra- Mumbai-400080. Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Allpm 8887 F Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 Jalaja Sadhu Moolya, Income Tax Officer-29(1)(5), C/4, Block No. 51, Gokul Ashish Chs, C-10, First Floor, Room No. 107, Dr. R.P. Road, Mulund (West), Vs. Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra- Mumbai-400080. Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Allpm 8887 F Appellant Respondent

property, was not produced for was not produced for verification of source of cash in his hand. The relevant finding of the verification of source of cash in his hand. The relevant finding of the verification of source of cash in his hand. The relevant finding of the Assessing Officer are reproduced as under: Assessing Officer are reproduced as under

JALAJA SADHU MOOLYA,MUMBAI vs. ITO 29 (1)(5), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2008-09 Jalaja Sadhu Moolya, Income Tax Officer-23(2)(3), C/4, Block No. 51, Gokul Ashish Chs, C-10, First Floor, Room No. 107, Dr. R.P. Road, Mulund (West), Vs. Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra- Mumbai-400080. Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Allpm 8887 F Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 Jalaja Sadhu Moolya, Income Tax Officer-29(1)(5), C/4, Block No. 51, Gokul Ashish Chs, C-10, First Floor, Room No. 107, Dr. R.P. Road, Mulund (West), Vs. Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra- Mumbai-400080. Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Allpm 8887 F Appellant Respondent

property, was not produced for was not produced for verification of source of cash in his hand. The relevant finding of the verification of source of cash in his hand. The relevant finding of the verification of source of cash in his hand. The relevant finding of the Assessing Officer are reproduced as under: Assessing Officer are reproduced as under

SHRI. HITENDRA C GHADIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 1 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year: 2014-2015

house property, business, capital gain and property, business, capital gain and other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in tax Act, 1961 (in short

SHRI. HITENDRA C GHADIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 1 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year: 2014-2015

house property, business, capital gain and property, business, capital gain and other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in tax Act, 1961 (in short

SHRI HITENDRA C. GHADIA ,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year: 2014-2015

house property, business, capital gain and property, business, capital gain and other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of other sources. A search and seizure action under section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in tax Act, 1961 (in short