BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4,019 results for “disallowance”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,100Delhi663Jaipur287Kolkata271Bangalore260Hyderabad183Chennai179Pune132Ahmedabad130Surat129Indore96Rajkot93Chandigarh84Visakhapatnam81Cochin38Guwahati35Amritsar35Raipur33Nagpur32Panaji26Ranchi21Agra20Lucknow20Jodhpur17Cuttack17Allahabad11Karnataka6Varanasi5Patna5Telangana3Jabalpur2Dehradun2SC2Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)79Addition to Income67Survey u/s 133A63Section 133A55Section 153A51Section 14846Section 14742Section 13240Section 153C39Disallowance

SHRI SHRIRAM TOSHNIWAL,BURHANPUR vs. ACIT, KHANDWA

In the result appeal the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2014-15 Shri Shriram Toshniwal, Asstt. Commissioner Of Prop. M/S. Gayatri Vs. Income Tax, Enterprises, Udyog Nagar, Khandwa Burhanpur (Appellant) (Respondent ) Pan Abxpt0602K Revenue By Shri K.C. Selvamani, Sr.Dr Assessee By Shri Maneesh Vaidya & Ms. Preeti Patwa, Cas Date Of Hearing 18.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 11.04.2019 O R D E R

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14A

133A of the Act conducted at the premises of the assessee on 22.01.2014. During the course of survey excess cash of Rs.9,45,500/- and excess stock of Rs.3,91,60,110/- was found. After survey a retraction letter was filed on 28.4.2014 and the surrender made on amount of excess stock was revised to Rs.1,82,15,777/- instead

M/S MOJIKA REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR

Showing 1–20 of 4,019 · Page 1 of 201

...
32
Section 6824
Search & Seizure18

In the result, the sole ground of appeal taken by the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 1429/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Nov 2020AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Manish Agarwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar (CIT)
Section 133ASection 133A(3)Section 145(3)

u/s 133A without any corroborating evidence cannot be sustained in the eyes of law and the ld CIT(A) has rightly appreciated the facts of the case and has followed the legal proposition so laid down by the Courts including the jurisdictional High Court in the decisions referred supra. We accordingly doesn’t see any illegality or perversity

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR vs. M/S MOJIKA REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

In the result, the sole ground of appeal taken by the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 1236/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Nov 2020AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Manish Agarwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar (CIT)
Section 133ASection 133A(3)Section 145(3)

u/s 133A without any corroborating evidence cannot be sustained in the eyes of law and the ld CIT(A) has rightly appreciated the facts of the case and has followed the legal proposition so laid down by the Courts including the jurisdictional High Court in the decisions referred supra. We accordingly doesn’t see any illegality or perversity

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. G NINE MODULAR PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3212/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale ()

For Appellant: Mr. Naresh Jain, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DR

133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was tax Act, 1961 was carried out in the premises of the company M/s carried out in the premises of the company M/s carried out in the premises of the company M/s TanayaVincom TanayaVincom TanayaVincom Pt Pt Pt Ltd Ltd Ltd on on on 13.11.2019. 13.11.2019. 13.11.2019. The The The survey survey survey

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. G NINE MODULAR PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3213/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale ()

For Appellant: Mr. Naresh Jain, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DR

133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was tax Act, 1961 was carried out in the premises of the company M/s carried out in the premises of the company M/s carried out in the premises of the company M/s TanayaVincom TanayaVincom TanayaVincom Pt Pt Pt Ltd Ltd Ltd on on on 13.11.2019. 13.11.2019. 13.11.2019. The The The survey survey survey

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. G NINE MODULAR PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3214/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale ()

For Appellant: Mr. Naresh Jain, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DR

133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was tax Act, 1961 was carried out in the premises of the company M/s carried out in the premises of the company M/s carried out in the premises of the company M/s TanayaVincom TanayaVincom TanayaVincom Pt Pt Pt Ltd Ltd Ltd on on on 13.11.2019. 13.11.2019. 13.11.2019. The The The survey survey survey

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

ITA 136/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Shishir Bajpai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 69A

disallowed by the AO is placed. It was submitted by ld. Counsel for the assessee that tax audit of the accounts was duly conducted and these expenses are duly reflected in the books of accounts of the assessee. It was submitted that return of income was filed on 07.11.2017, while survey u/s 133A

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1791/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

133A conducted on them and the disallowance / addition is not based on any tangible material found during the course of search u/s 132 of the Act on Podar Group. The Ld.AR also argued that the statements recorded u/s 131 during the course of survey

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1790/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

133A conducted on them and the disallowance / addition is not based on any tangible material found during the course of search u/s 132 of the Act on Podar Group. The Ld.AR also argued that the statements recorded u/s 131 during the course of survey

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1792/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

133A conducted on them and the disallowance / addition is not based on any tangible material found during the course of search u/s 132 of the Act on Podar Group. The Ld.AR also argued that the statements recorded u/s 131 during the course of survey

RATAN TAXTILES P. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, JAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the

ITA 527/JPR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Apr 2017AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal &For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Singh (Addl.CIT)
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)

survey u/s 133A of the Act. The AO disallowed 75% of the stipend expenditure claimed by the appellant against approximately

POONA OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 518/PUN/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Mar 2025
Section 12A

disallowed the benefit of the exemption for\ncommission provided to doctors engaged in private practice for referring\ntheir patients to the assessee's diagnostic centre, holding that:\n"It, thus, emerges that an assessee would not be entitled to\ndeduction of payments made in contravention of law. Similarly,\npayments which are opposed to public policy being in the nature

M/S KESARWANI MARKETING (P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT (OSD), ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 154/ALLD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad01 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Shri UtkarshFor Respondent: Shri Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 40

survey u/s 133A on 27.08.2009, which assessee is required to explain. Principles of natural justice also demand that all the relied upon seized/impounded material as well relied upon statements recorded be also provided to assessee for rebuttal (if not yet provided but relied upon during set aside proceedings to cause prejudice to assessee), before any prejudice is caused

KESARWANI MARKETING(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 373/ALLD/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad01 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Shri UtkarshFor Respondent: Shri Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 40

survey u/s 133A on 27.08.2009, which assessee is required to explain. Principles of natural justice also demand that all the relied upon seized/impounded material as well relied upon statements recorded be also provided to assessee for rebuttal (if not yet provided but relied upon during set aside proceedings to cause prejudice to assessee), before any prejudice is caused

J.V. CHEM (INDIA),MUMBAI vs. ITO 22(1)2, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result , both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed, as indicated above

ITA 3786/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3786/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), Ito 22(1)(2), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Building, Ghatkopar East, Vashi, Mumbai- 400077 Navi Mumbai स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aabfj4268L आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3763/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Ito 22(1)(2), बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station Building, R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Vashi, Ghatkopar East, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400077 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabfj4268L (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. Rajeev Gubgotra (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 40Section 41

133A, 15 person came at the office premises (a tiny space of l80sq feet) for making the survey, consisting of ITO’s/ADC1T and staff of 1TO. The search commenced in afternoon and was completed in early morning to next day. During the survey operation all record of assessee was mixed in a very small place and there was a total

ITO 22(1)-2, NAVI MUMBAI vs. J V CHEM (INDIA), MUMBAI

In the result , both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed, as indicated above

ITA 3763/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3786/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), Ito 22(1)(2), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Building, Ghatkopar East, Vashi, Mumbai- 400077 Navi Mumbai स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aabfj4268L आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3763/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Ito 22(1)(2), बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station Building, R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Vashi, Ghatkopar East, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400077 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabfj4268L (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. Rajeev Gubgotra (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 40Section 41

133A, 15 person came at the office premises (a tiny space of l80sq feet) for making the survey, consisting of ITO’s/ADC1T and staff of 1TO. The search commenced in afternoon and was completed in early morning to next day. During the survey operation all record of assessee was mixed in a very small place and there was a total

S.P.MANI AND MOHAN DAIRY,ERODE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, ERODE

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee and revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1321/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mrs.G.Vardini Karthik, CAFor Respondent: Ms.R.Anitha, JCIT
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 41(1)Section 41(1)(a)

disallow these interest expenses which stood added to the income of the asssseee by the AO, vide assessment order dated 30.12.2016 passed by the AO u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act. 7. The AO further observed that during the course of survey operations conducted by Revenue against the assessee on 06.11.2013 u/s 133A

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S DLF LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 3061/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Section 133ASection 142Section 143(2)Section 144Section 146Section 250

survey was also conducted u/s 133A of the Act at the company’s premises at P-39 (Basement), NDSE, Part II, New Delhi and certain documents were found. On 30.06.2008, CIT (A), Delhi IV granted approval of conducting the special audit of books of accounts of the assesse for this year. In accordance with that, a special auditor was appointed

DLF LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2677/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Section 133ASection 142Section 143(2)Section 144Section 146Section 250

survey was also conducted u/s 133A of the Act at the company’s premises at P-39 (Basement), NDSE, Part II, New Delhi and certain documents were found. On 30.06.2008, CIT (A), Delhi IV granted approval of conducting the special audit of books of accounts of the assesse for this year. In accordance with that, a special auditor was appointed

PINK CITY JEWEL HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED ,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

ITA 598/JPR/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Sh. Siddharth Ranka, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Saurav Harsh, Adv.&
Section 10ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144oSection 14ASection 263Section 69

disallowed, subsequently relief was granted to the assessee appellant by the Hon'ble ITAT. 1.12. That survey proceeding u/s 133A