BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,416 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai470Delhi286Kolkata127Bangalore119Chennai94Ahmedabad92Pune45Jaipur43Hyderabad27Lucknow27Indore22Rajkot14Surat11Chandigarh6Visakhapatnam5Jodhpur5Raipur4Cochin3Nagpur3Ranchi2Amritsar2SC1Allahabad1Telangana1Jabalpur1Agra1Dehradun1Cuttack1Panaji1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80G129Section 1187Section 143(3)76Addition to Income67Deduction61Disallowance56Section 12A52Section 26341Exemption38Section 143(1)

JEEVANDEEP EDUMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE CIT-6, MUMBAI

In the result, the a In the result, the appeal of the assessee is stands allowed

ITA 2517/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Jeevandeep Edumedia Pvt. Ltd., Pr. Cit-6, 1St Floor, Sun Paradise Business 501,5Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Plaza, Senapati Bapat Marg, Vs. Maharishi Karve Road, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400013. Pan No. Aabcj 0180 G Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Vivek Perampurna, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Parikh
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

disallowed deduction under section 80G Officer ('AO'), disallowed deduction under section 80G Officer ('AO'), disallowed deduction under section 80G on the basis

Showing 1–20 of 1,416 · Page 1 of 71

...
31
Section 25030
Section 14729

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1084/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Sourabh Soparkar, Advocate Represented by Department : Dr. Narendra Kumar NFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR Date of Conclusion of Hearing : 11/11/2025
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

disallowed and added back in terms of Explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Act. In terms of section 135(5) of the Act read with section 80G

JASHAN JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. PCIT -5, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is stands allowed

ITA 2614/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Jashan Jewels Pvt. Ltd., Pcit, Mumbai-5, 301-B Aman Chambers Room No. 515, 5Th Floor, Aayakar Premises Co. Soc. Ltd., Mama Vs. Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Road, Paramand Marg, Opera House, Mumbai-400020. Girgaon, Mumbai-400 004. Pan No. Aabcj 7040 D Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Ishraq Contractor
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)Section 80G

Section 80G would negate the specific statutory disallowance Section 80G would negate the specific statutory disallowance Section 80G would negate

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1083/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

section 80G, even if\nthe contribution qualifies as CSR expenditure under the CA 2013.\nHence deduction of Rs.1,88,97,644 claimed u/s 80G was disallowed

JCIT(OSD)-14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. AVENDUS CAPITAL PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 404/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Jcit (Osd)-14(1)(1), M/S Avendus Capital Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 432, 4Th Floor, 901, Platina, 9Th Floor, Plot No. Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, C59, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400020. Bandra East, Mumbai-400051. Pan No.Aabcc 2404 Q Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Ashish Mehta &For Respondent: Dr. K.R. Subhash, CIT-DR
Section 14ASection 37(1)

disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80G of the Act on Corporate Social Responsibility under section 80G of the Act on Corporate

POLYNOVA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 14(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2982/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Polynova Industries Limited Dcit 14(1)(1) 159, Cst Road, Kalina, Aayakar Bhavan,4Th Floor, Santacruz East, Vs. Mumbai- 400001 Mumbai- 400098 Pan No. Aabcl 0864 D Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Rajan Vora &For Respondent: Mr. R. A. Dhyani, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the benefit of deduction can be given regardless of the contrasting explanations provided under section 37. Section 37 disallows

LIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 2(2)(1), MUMBAI, AAYKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5037/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Respondent: Mr. Sunil Bhandari &
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 80G

section 80G. disallowance of the said deduction under section 80G. disallowance of the said deduction under section 80G. 3.2 The assessee

A.K. CAPITAL SERVICES LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. PCIT, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2959/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, () & Shri Prabhash Shankar, ()

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

disallowance of CSR expenses is required to be made under section 37(1), but there is no statutory bar in claiming deduction under section 80G

OPTUM GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE -5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 482/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AR
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 37Section 80GSection 80G(2)

disallowed and added back in terms of Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) of the Act. In terms of Section 135(5) of the Act read with Section 80G

OPTUM GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 145/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AR
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 37Section 80GSection 80G(2)

disallowed and added back in terms of Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) of the Act. In terms of Section 135(5) of the Act read with Section 80G

SUPREME BUILDESTATES PVT LTD,MADANGANJ- KISHANGARH vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2 AJMER, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 495/JPR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri C.M. Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT) a
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 2Section 234BSection 37Section 80Section 80G

Section 80G of the Act. The TPO/A.O. has disallowed substantial portion of donation under Section 80G of the Act on the ground

M/S JMS MINING PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 146/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Jul 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri P. M .Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 135Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 37Section 80G

Section 80G of the Act. The TPO/A.O. has disallowed substantial portion of donation under Section 80G of the Act on the ground

HERE SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CIRCLE 4(2)(1), MUMBAI), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6658/MUM/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jan 2026AY 2022-2023

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2022-23

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Salunkhe, Sr. DR
Section 144C(5)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(1)(i)Section 80G(5)

disallowances in accordance with Section 28-44BB of the Act including Explanation to Section 37(1). Thus, Section 37(1) and Section 80G

RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 8(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed,\nwhereas the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3510/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 250Section 80GSection 80JSection 92C

disallowance of deduction under section 80G for CSR donations, restriction of deduction under section 80JJAA, disallowance under section 14A, addition

DELOITTEE TAX SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 341/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri SP. Chidambaram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT-DR
Section 135Section 135(5)Section 30Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(2)

disallowed and added back in terms of Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) of the Act. In terms of Section 135(5) of the Act read with Section 80G

DELOITTE & TOUCHE ASSURANCE & ENTERPRISE RISK SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 342/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri SP. Chidambaram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT-DR
Section 135Section 135(5)Section 30Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(2)

disallowed and added back in terms of Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) of the Act. In terms of Section 135(5) of the Act read with Section 80G

JEWELEX INDIA PRIAVTE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 14(1)(1) , MUMBAI

In the result, both the above appeals of the assessee\nare allowed

ITA 5283/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Nitesh Joshi / Shri P P Bhandari,ARsFor Respondent: \nMs. Kavitha Kaushik, (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80G

disallowance of deduction for CSR expenditure under Section 80G was considered unwarranted.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "Section 80G", "Section 135", "Section

MAHANSARIA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT, MUMBAI-5, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2158/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Rahul Chaudharyassessment Year : 2020-21 Mahansaria Enterprises Private The Principal Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax (Pcit), 301-304, 3Rd Floor, Vs. Room No. 515, 5Th Floor, Peninsula Chambers, Aayakar Bhavan, Peninsula Corporate Park, Maharshi Karve Road, G.K. Marg, Lower Parel West, Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400026 Pan : Aaacy1568L (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Vipul Joshi, Adv. & Prashant Bhumare For Revenue : Shri Satyaprakash R. Singh, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 14-05-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 11-06-2025 O R D E R Per Vikram Singh Yadav, A.M : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-5 [„Ld.Pcit‟] U/S. 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 („The Act‟), Dated 17-03-2025, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2020-21, Wherein The Assessee Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Joshi, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Satyaprakash R. Singh, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)Section 80G

disallowances in accordance with Section 28-44BB of the Act including Explanation to Section 37(1). Thus, Section 37(1) and Section 80G

POWER MECH PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 155/HYD/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Aug 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Vinod, ARFor Respondent: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 12ASection 135Section 135(5)Section 30Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(2)

disallowed and added back in terms of Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) of the Act. In terms of Section 135(5) of the Act read with Section 80G

JEWELEX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-14(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the above appeals of the assessee\nare allowed

ITA 5284/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri Nitesh Joshi / Shri P P Bhandari,ARsFor Respondent: \nMs. Kavitha Kaushik, (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80G

disallowance. However, there is no discussion about\nthe issue identified by ld. Pr. CIT while exercising his jurisdiction under section 263.\nHowever, on perusal of notices under section 142(1) dated 8.06.2022, we find that\nassessing officer sought explanation on various issues including on the deduction\nunder section 80G