BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

20,674 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,445Delhi5,305Bangalore1,942Chennai1,680Kolkata993Ahmedabad992Hyderabad716Pune561Jaipur527Chandigarh299Indore258Raipur208Surat208Cochin204Rajkot179Nagpur152Visakhapatnam145Amritsar145Lucknow91Guwahati80Ranchi71Panaji66Allahabad65Cuttack60SC57Patna57Jodhpur50Agra42Dehradun34Jabalpur30Varanasi9H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)55Disallowance46Addition to Income41Section 14A38Section 4031Deduction28Section 25021Section 26321Section 143(1)19Section 115J

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

C.A. No.-007865-007865 - 2009Supreme Court29 Jul 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 40

disallowed a lump sum of Rs. 20,000/- from various expenses debited to the Profit and Loss Account and finalised the assessment, accordingly, as under:- “Therefore, considering the provisions of Section 194C, Section 40

DCIT, CIR 16(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S KPMG ASSURANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES LLP, MUMBAI

ITA 2276/MUM/2023[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Aug 2024

disallowed the deduction for the same by\ninvoking provisions contained in Section 40(a)(i) of the Act.\nFurther, the Assessing

Showing 1–20 of 20,674 · Page 1 of 1,034

...
17
Survey u/s 133A16
Section 13215

ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) /OSD , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1689/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Percy Padiwala, Sr
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40(a)(i). Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions

ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIAVTE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) /OSD LTU , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1690/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Percy Padiwala, Sr
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40(a)(i). Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions

DCIT, CIR 16(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S KPMG ASSURANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES LLP, MUMBAI

ITA 2272/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

disallowed the deduction for the same by\ninvoking provisions contained in Section 40(a)(i) of the Act.\nFurther, the Assessing

DCIT, CIR 16(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S KPMG ASSURANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES LLP, MUMBAI

ITA 2275/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

disallowed the deduction for the same by\ninvoking provisions contained in Section 40(a)(i) of the Act.\nFurther, the Assessing

KPMG ASSURANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CIRCLE-16(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2412/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

disallowed the deduction for the same by\ninvoking provisions contained in Section 40(a)(i) of the Act.\nFurther, the Assessing

KPMG ASSURANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -16(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2410/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

disallowed the deduction for the same by\ninvoking provisions contained in Section 40(a)(i) of the Act.\nFurther, the Assessing

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTPU , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2846/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C(3)

disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40(a)(i). Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions

ACIT, CIRCLE, BHARATPUR vs. M/S. JAGDAMBE STONE COMPANY, BHARATPUR

In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1171/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Gupta (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Rooni Paul (Addl.CIT-DR) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(2)Section 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) read with section 194C of the Act. IN this regard, he placed reliance on the judgement

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE vs. M/S.DELL INDIA PVT.LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 2035/BANG/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40(a)(i). Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions

DELL INDIA P LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), LTU, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 1644/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40(a)(i). Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions

DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 1151/BANG/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40(a)(i). Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions

KERALA STATE BEVERAGES MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING CORPORATION LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1)

Accordingly, the civil appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

C.A. No.-000011-000011 - 2022Supreme Court03 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40

Section 40 (a) (iib) and is not an amount which can be disallowed   under   the   said   provision.   Therefore   the disallowance

M/S. CENTURY SILICON CITY,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2)(1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1102/BANG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, D.R
Section 143(3)

disallowed under section 36(1)(iii). Section 40 is not a standalone section, it has to be read with section

M/S. CENTURY SILICON CITY,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2)(1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1100/BANG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, D.R
Section 143(3)

disallowed under section 36(1)(iii). Section 40 is not a standalone section, it has to be read with section

M/S. CENTURY SILICON CITY,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2)(1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1101/BANG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, D.R
Section 143(3)

disallowed under section 36(1)(iii). Section 40 is not a standalone section, it has to be read with section

CENTURY SHELTORS,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1075/BANG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, D.R
Section 143(3)

disallowed under section 36(1)(iii). Section 40 is not a standalone section, it has to be read with section

CENTURY SHELTORS,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1074/BANG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, D.R
Section 143(3)

disallowed under section 36(1)(iii). Section 40 is not a standalone section, it has to be read with section

CENTURY SHELTORS,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1073/BANG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, D.R
Section 143(3)

disallowed under section 36(1)(iii). Section 40 is not a standalone section, it has to be read with section