M/S MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla () & Ms. Padmavathy S. ()

section 194I of the Act. The Assessing Officer did not accept the submissions of the assessee and proceeded to disallow

ASST CIT 3, MUMBAI vs. PRAMOD RATAN PATIL, MUMBAI

In the result, Appeal of Ld AO is dismissed, appeal of assessee is allowed partly

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm Shri Pramod Ratan Patil Acit A–1, Chandresh Oasis, Lodha Circle–3, Kalyan, 2 Nd Floor, Heaven, Vs. Kalyan Shil Road, Dombivali (East), Rani Mansion, Murbad Road, Thane–421201 Kalyan West–421301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadpp6274F Acit Shri Pramod Ratan Patil Circle–3, A–1, Chandresh Oasis, Lodha Kalyan, 2 Nd Floor, Heaven, Vs. Rani Mansion, Murbad Road, Kalyan Shil Road, Dombivali (East), Kalyan West–421301 Thane–421201 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Mr. Satyaprakash Singh, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Nihar Ranjan Samal, Dr

disallowance under section 40 A (3) of the act with respect to the purchases of the material. The assessee’s claim is that there is no cash payment made by the assessee which is in violation of the provisions of section 40 A (3) of the act and the learned departmental representative has categorically relied upon the orders

PRAMOD RATAN PATIL,THANE vs. ASST CIT CIR 3, KALYAN

In the result, Appeal of Ld AO is dismissed, appeal of assessee is allowed partly

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm Shri Pramod Ratan Patil Acit A–1, Chandresh Oasis, Lodha Circle–3, Kalyan, 2 Nd Floor, Heaven, Vs. Kalyan Shil Road, Dombivali (East), Rani Mansion, Murbad Road, Thane–421201 Kalyan West–421301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadpp6274F Acit Shri Pramod Ratan Patil Circle–3, A–1, Chandresh Oasis, Lodha Kalyan, 2 Nd Floor, Heaven, Vs. Rani Mansion, Murbad Road, Kalyan Shil Road, Dombivali (East), Kalyan West–421301 Thane–421201 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Mr. Satyaprakash Singh, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Nihar Ranjan Samal, Dr

disallowance under section 40 A (3) of the act with respect to the purchases of the material. The assessee’s claim is that there is no cash payment made by the assessee which is in violation of the provisions of section 40 A (3) of the act and the learned departmental representative has categorically relied upon the orders

SHIVALIK VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC 8(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

Bench: Ms Padmavathy S, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) made towards non-deduction of tax at source under section 194I on the payments

STOCK TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT OSD-2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Pawan Singhstock Traders Private Ltd. Acit (Osd)-2(3) 63, Bombay Samachar Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400001. Mumbai-400020. Vs. Pan: Aaacs7235A Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Nitesh Joshi (Ar) Respondent By : Shri Nishant Somaiya (Sr. Dr) Date Of Hearing : 03.04.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.04.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act

section 194I. 21. We have considered the submission of the parties and have gone through the orders of authorities below. The Assessing Officer discussed the ground of appeal that disallowance

DCIT8(3), MUMBAI vs. WAH RESTAURANTS P.LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. MARS RESTAURATNS P.LTD), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ashwani Taneja

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non– deduction of tax at source under section 194I on payment of revenue

SAHANA DWELLERS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 8(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal stands allowed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kochar

section 194I of the Act, hence, disallowance of expenditure under section 40(a)(ia) alleging non–deduction of tax at source

DCIT 8(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. TATA TELESERVICES (MAH) LTD, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Pawan Singhdcit-8(3)(1) M/S Tata Teleservices (Mah) Room No. 615, 6Th Floor, Ltd., D-26, Ttc Indl Area Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Midc, Sanpada, P.O. Turbhe, Mumbai-20. Navi Mumbai-400703. Vs. Pan: Aaach1458C Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy (Cit-Dr) Respondent By : Shri Hiten Chande (Ar) Date Of Hearing : 21.01.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.01.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act

194I of the Act and, consequently, the provisions of section 201 and section 201(IA) could not be applied? (b) Without prejudice to the above, whet her, on t he facts and in the circumstances of the case and i n law, payment of wheeling and transmission charges t o the entitles like MSETCL and P G CIL, should have