BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15,733 results for “disallowance”+ Section 147clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,530Delhi2,681Chennai1,347Bangalore923Kolkata910Ahmedabad602Jaipur489Surat410Hyderabad394Pune330Chandigarh223Indore221Rajkot210Raipur173Cochin167Nagpur163Visakhapatnam121Amritsar97Lucknow89Karnataka70Cuttack69Panaji63Guwahati56Agra53Allahabad53Patna52Calcutta50Jodhpur45Telangana39Ranchi23SC20Dehradun18Jabalpur17Punjab & Haryana8Varanasi5Kerala4Orissa2Rajasthan2Gauhati2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14881Section 143(3)78Section 14764Addition to Income62Section 271(1)(c)44Disallowance35Deduction26Reopening of Assessment26Section 6823Section 263

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2622/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 of Act are also quashed. Thus Ground No.1 raised by the Assessee is allowed and Ground No.2 is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Ground No.3 to 7: 19. Ground No. 3 to 7 raised by the Assessee pertains to disallowance

Showing 1–20 of 15,733 · Page 1 of 787

...
22
Section 25019
Reassessment19

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2830/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 of Act are also quashed. Thus Ground No.1 raised by the Assessee is allowed and Ground No.2 is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Ground No.3 to 7: 19. Ground No. 3 to 7 raised by the Assessee pertains to disallowance

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2616/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 of Act are also quashed. Thus Ground No.1 raised by the Assessee is allowed and Ground No.2 is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Ground No.3 to 7: 19. Ground No. 3 to 7 raised by the Assessee pertains to disallowance

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2823/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 of Act are also quashed. Thus Ground No.1 raised by the Assessee is allowed and Ground No.2 is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Ground No.3 to 7: 19. Ground No. 3 to 7 raised by the Assessee pertains to disallowance

THE TATA POWER COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT 2, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is allowed, as indicated above

ITA 1307/MUM/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey () & Shri Rajesh Kumar ()

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 147Section 263Section 80I

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 11-12-2017 disallowing the expenditure of Rs.68,62,780/-. 3. After

KOME KORAVADI VIVIDODDESHA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA,UDUPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, UDUPI

ITA 3061/BANG/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Mar 2026AY 2013-14
Section 147Section 234ASection 263Section 43BSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

147 r.w.s.143(3) of the Act vide\norder dated 14-12-2018 wherein the deduction claimed under section\n80P of the Act was disallowed

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 2836/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2015-16
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of\nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section\n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the\napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section\n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which\nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the\nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 2845/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2012-13
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of\nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section\n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the\napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section\n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which\nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the\nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, MUMBAI

Accordingly, in terms of the aforesaid, Ground No. 3 to\n7 raised by the Assessee pertaining to merits of such\nadditions/disallowances are dismissed as having been rendered\ninfructuous

ITA 2623/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: "CLEAN_TEXT": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n\"I\" BENCH, MUMBAI\n\nSHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nSHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of\nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section\n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the\napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section\n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which\nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the\nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -3(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2617/MUM/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2010-11
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of\nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section\n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the\napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section\n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which\nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the\nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

WINSOME TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 528/CHANDI/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 is attracted. The reasons to believe ought to also paraphrase any investigation report which may form the basis of the reasons and any enquiry conducted by the AO on the same and if so, the conclusions thereof; (iii) where the reasons make a reference to another document, whether as a letter or report, such document and/ or relevant

SHRI HUMAD JAIN SAKH SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT,INDORE vs. ITO 2(1), INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 547/IND/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jul 2025AY 2012-13
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80P

147 based on information regarding cash deposits. During the reassessment, the AO disallowed the deduction claimed u/s 80P.", "held": "The Tribunal held that the AO's order denying the deduction u/s 80P was bad and illegal. The interpretation of Section

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 2834/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 of the \nAct the Assessing Officer, inter-alia, disallowed deduction \nclaimed by the Assessee for aggregate expenses of \nINR.72

ACIT, CIRCLE - 25, KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. MALA ROY & OTHERS, KOLKATA

In the result, this appeal of the In the result, this appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 406/KOL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

Section 147 of the Act, had been violated. 11 Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 C.O. No. 407/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Mala Roy & Others 9. As we have quashed the reopening of assessment, the revenue appeal in ITA As we have quashed the reopening of assessment, the revenue appeal in ITA As we have quashed

ACIT, CIRCLE - 25, KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. MALA ROY & OTHERS, KOLKATA

In the result, this appeal of the In the result, this appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 407/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

Section 147 of the Act, had been violated. 11 Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2012-13 C.O. No. 407/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Mala Roy & Others 9. As we have quashed the reopening of assessment, the revenue appeal in ITA As we have quashed the reopening of assessment, the revenue appeal in ITA As we have quashed

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly, in terms of the aforesaid, Ground No. 3 to\n7 raised by the Assessee pertaining to merits of such\nadditions/disallowances are dismissed as having been rendered\ninfructuous

ITA 2841/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2014-15
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of\nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section\n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the\napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section\n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which\nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the\nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2620/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 147 of the\nAct the Assessing Officer, inter-alia, disallowed deduction\nclaimed by the Assessee for aggregate expenses of\nINR.72

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2621/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2017-18
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of \nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section \n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the \napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section \n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which \nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the \nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -3(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2618/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2013-14
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of\nthe Act. Thereafter, the case was again reopened under Section\n147 of the Act after recording the reason and after obtaining the\napproval from the competent authority. The notice under Section\n148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 30/03/2017 which\nwas served on the Assessee on 31/03/2017. In response the\nAssessee vide letter, dated 17/04/2017

SHRI MADHO LAL SAINI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 238/JPR/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Mar 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Shri S. Najmi (CIT)
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 54BSection 54FSection 69

147. The action of Id. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by quashing the reassessment proceedings. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law Id. AO has erred in re- opening the case of the assessee by issuing notice under section