BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4,157 results for “disallowance”+ Section 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,080Delhi694Bangalore302Jaipur292Kolkata272Chennai203Hyderabad175Pune146Ahmedabad142Surat137Rajkot95Indore94Visakhapatnam90Chandigarh86Guwahati38Nagpur36Amritsar33Cochin31Raipur30Panaji23Lucknow21Cuttack21Ranchi21Agra19Jodhpur17Karnataka14Allahabad12Patna8Varanasi6Kerala5SC5Telangana3Calcutta2Dehradun2Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)80Addition to Income68Survey u/s 133A62Section 133A55Section 153A55Section 14752Section 14847Section 153C39Section 13231Disallowance

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 277/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jul 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) on account of payment of disbursed prize monies. 2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of 75 days on the part of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee has filed an application seeking condonation of the said I.T.A. No. 277/KOL./2016

KRISHNAMURTHY L/R BY SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

Showing 1–20 of 4,157 · Page 1 of 208

...
31
Section 6825
Reopening of Assessment14

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 569/BANG/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Ravishankar S. V, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Balusamy N, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 133ASection 234A

disallowance of Rs.5,00,000/- towards various expenditure, without rejecting the books of the appellant on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The authorities below have failed to appreciate that it is settled position of law, that "consent does not confer jurisdiction", on the facts and circumstances of the case. 6. The authorities below have failed to appreciate

KRISHNAMURTHY L/R BY SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 568/BANG/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Ravishankar S. V, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Balusamy N, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 133ASection 234A

disallowance of Rs.5,00,000/- towards various expenditure, without rejecting the books of the appellant on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The authorities below have failed to appreciate that it is settled position of law, that "consent does not confer jurisdiction", on the facts and circumstances of the case. 6. The authorities below have failed to appreciate

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR vs. M/S MOJIKA REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

In the result, the sole ground of appeal taken by the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 1236/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Nov 2020AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Manish Agarwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar (CIT)
Section 133ASection 133A(3)Section 145(3)

133A without any corroborating evidence cannot be sustained in the eyes of law and the ld CIT(A) has rightly appreciated the facts of the case and has followed the legal proposition so laid down by the Courts including the jurisdictional High Court in the decisions referred supra. We accordingly doesn’t see any illegality or perversity in the findings

M/S MOJIKA REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR

In the result, the sole ground of appeal taken by the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 1429/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Nov 2020AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Manish Agarwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ranjan Kumar (CIT)
Section 133ASection 133A(3)Section 145(3)

133A without any corroborating evidence cannot be sustained in the eyes of law and the ld CIT(A) has rightly appreciated the facts of the case and has followed the legal proposition so laid down by the Courts including the jurisdictional High Court in the decisions referred supra. We accordingly doesn’t see any illegality or perversity in the findings

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1791/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

section 133A was also carried out on associated entities/individuals on the same date and subsequent dates. Later this assessment was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2018. The return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act was filed by the assessee on 22.11.2018 declaring total income

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1792/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

section 133A was also carried out on associated entities/individuals on the same date and subsequent dates. Later this assessment was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2018. The return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act was filed by the assessee on 22.11.2018 declaring total income

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. ANANDILAL & GANESH PODAR SOCIETY, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1790/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

Section 147

section 133A was also carried out on associated entities/individuals on the same date and subsequent dates. Later this assessment was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 26.03.2018. The return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act was filed by the assessee on 22.11.2018 declaring total income

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7209/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

M. R. CONSTRUCTION,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 790/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

ACIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 1144/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7212/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

ASST CIT CC-22, MUMBAI vs. JAWAHAR PUROHIT, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 6848/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3711/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

DCIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3645/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7208/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

DCIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3646/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7213/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7211/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3710/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

disallowance restricted by CIT(A) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87,810/-. The CIT(A) has also rightly deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/-on labour charges and Rs. 1,00,000/- on professional charges