BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,077 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai203Pune179Chennai156Bangalore117Cochin116Panaji53Kolkata32Ahmedabad29Nagpur25Jaipur25Hyderabad24Visakhapatnam19Lucknow19Delhi14Surat12Rajkot12Chandigarh12Indore11Raipur9Patna4Jabalpur2Guwahati1SC1Amritsar1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 80P204Section 80P(2)(d)149Deduction90Section 80P(2)(a)74Section 143(1)68Section 143(3)68Condonation of Delay49Section 25039Section 139(1)39Addition to Income

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MYDT JOBAT,ALIRAJPUR vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT OFFICER, ALIRAJPUR

ITA 663/IND/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiadim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti National Faceless बनाम/ Mydt., Assessment Centre Vs. 01, Jobat, Jobat, Delhi Alirajpur (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaala0577E Assessee By Shri P.D. Nagar, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr

Section 143(3)Section 253(5)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing. 4. The assessee is a co-operative society engaged in business of providing credit facilities to its members. For AY 2020-21, the assessee filed return declaring total income of Rs. 40/-. In the return of income so filed, the assessee claimed deduction of Rs. 22,95,983/- u/s 80P(2)(d

SHRI BASAVESHWAR SOUHARDA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMIT ,KALLOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GOKAK

In the result, the appeal filed by the appeal is allowed”

Showing 1–20 of 1,077 · Page 1 of 54

...
31
Section 26321
Disallowance20
ITA 485/PAN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji17 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE (Judicial Member), SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.485/PAN/2025 (A.Y. 2022-23) | Shri Basaveshwar Souharda Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, Kalloli Gokak, Belgavi-591224, Karnataka. | Vs | I.T.O., National e Assessment Centre, Delhi. | PAN .No. AAEAS1697N | | (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) | (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) | | Assessee by | None. Letter dated 13.03.2026 | | Revenue by | Sri Sanket Deshmukh.Sr.DR | | सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing | 16.03.2026 | | घोषणा की ता

Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

d) of the Act on interest income earned on deposits with the cooperative banks. 2. At the time of hearing, it was brought to the knowledge of the bench, that there is a delay of 146 days in filling the 2 ITA. No.485/PAN/2025 Shri Basaveshwar Souharda Sahakari Sangha Niyamit . appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal and the assesse has filed

HIRA MANEK CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 34(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2020-

ITA 8500/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailshri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Kumar GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Salunkhe, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80P

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–2, Indore [“learned Addl./Joint CIT(A)”], for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22, respectively. 2. The present appeals for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22 are delayed by 679 days and 650 days, respectively. Along with

HIRA MANEK CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 34(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2020-

ITA 8499/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailshri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Kumar GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Salunkhe, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80P

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–2, Indore [“learned Addl./Joint CIT(A)”], for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22, respectively. 2. The present appeals for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22 are delayed by 679 days and 650 days, respectively. Along with

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SATARA CIRCLE, SATARA, SATARA vs. SHRI SIDDHANATH NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYA DAHIWADI, MAN,SATARA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1801/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 2(19)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

section 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest\n/dividend received by a co-operative society from its investments in another co-\noperative society. He relied on the following decisions :\na. Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of Surat Vankar Sahakari Sangh Ltd. Vs\nACIT (421 ITR 134).\nb. Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of PCIT vs Totagurs

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SATARA CIRCLE, SATARA, SATARA vs. SHRI SIDDHANATH NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYA DAHIWADI, TAL. MAN SATARA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1800/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri R.C. DoshiFor Respondent: \nShri S. Sadananda Singh
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 2(19)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

section 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest\n/dividend received by a co-operative society from its investments in another co-\noperative society. He relied on the following decisions :\na. Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of Surat Vankar Sahakari Sangh Ltd. Vs\nACIT (421 ITR 134).\nb. Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of PCIT vs Totagurs

VARDHAMAN URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,BELGAUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4 BELGAUM, BELGAUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 42/PAN/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

ROHIT CHAMBERS PREMISES COOP SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 5812/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Rohit Chambers Premises Assessing Officer, Coop Society Limited, Ward 26(1)(1), Janmabhoomi Marg, Kautilya Bhavan, G Block Vs. Horniman Circle, Fort, Mumbai Bkc, Bandra Kurla – 400001. Complex, Bandra (E), Pan – Aaaar44550K. Mumbai 400051. (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Satish Mody, Ld. Ca Revenue By : Shri Praveen K. Srivastava, Ld. Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2025 O R D E R Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry: This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.03.2021, Impugned Herein, Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac)/Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (In Short Ld. Commissioner) U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For The A.Y. 2018-19. 2. In This Case, The Assessee By Filing Its Return Of Income On Dated 19.09.2018 Had Declared Gross Total Income Of Rs.26,69,680/- Under The Head Income From The Other Sources & Claimed The Same As Exempt Under Section 80P(2)(D) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Satish Mody, Ld. CAFor Respondent: Shri Praveen K. Srivastava, Ld. Sr. D.R
Section 119Section 139Section 2(19)Section 250Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(d)

condonation of delay under Section 119 (2) (b) of the Act. 5. Thus, the Assessee being aggrieved has challenged the aforesaid addition. 6. This Court has given thoughtful consideration to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. Admittedly the issue qua deduction claimed under Section 80 (2) (d) of the Act, on account of interest income earned from Cooperative

VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,MARDOL, PONDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANAJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 285/PAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

VIVIDODDSHESHA PRATHAMIK GRAMEEN KRUSHI SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT SOUDATTI,SOUDATTI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4, BELGAUM, BELGAUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 27/PAN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

KUMTA ADIKE MARATA SOPUHARDA SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,KUMTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, KARWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 153/PAN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

BASAV SOUHARDA CREDIT SAHAKARI NIYAMIT BAILHONGAL,BAILHONGALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTER, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 190/PAN/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

SHRI JAI JINENDRA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NIPANI, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 40/PAN/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

HAVYAKA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA,KUMTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KARWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 36/PAN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

AKSHAYA CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,KARWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), KARWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 159/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

HAVYAKA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA,KUMTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 KARWAR, KARWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 60/PAN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

SHRI BASAVESHWAR URBAN CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 180/PAN/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

SHRI BASAVESHWAR URBAN CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 179/PAN/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

AKSHAYA CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,KARWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1), KARWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 158/PAN/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024

SHRI JAI JINENDRA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT,BELAGAVI vs. NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTRE, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and twenty eight appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 41/PAN/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji28 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

D Karwar Limited National Faceless e- 4 161/PAN/2023 2020-21 Assessment centre, Delhi 5 255/PAN/2024 2015-16 ITO, Wd 2(4), Panaji 6 285/PAN/2024 2016-17 VPK Urban Co-op Mr. Shyam J AAAJV0180G Credit Society Kamat ITO, Wd 1(3), 7 286/PAN/2024 2017-18 Panaji ITO, Cir 1(3), 8 287/PAN/2024 2018-19 Panaji National Faceless e- 9 151/PAN/2024