BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,952 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai321Pune247Chennai201Ahmedabad201Delhi185Kolkata140Jaipur132Surat113Bangalore82Rajkot40Chandigarh37Amritsar35Hyderabad33Lucknow32Indore28Nagpur22Visakhapatnam17Agra13Cochin13Jodhpur11Cuttack10Jabalpur9Raipur6Panaji6Ranchi6Patna5Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun1Guwahati1Telangana1Allahabad1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 12A281Section 80G169Section 80G(5)151Exemption96Section 12A(1)(ac)77Section 1144Charitable Trust44Section 80G(5)(iii)27Natural Justice16Section 80G(5)(iv)

SILIGURI SALASAR BALAJEE SEWA TRUST,SILIGURI vs. C.I.T., (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 2702/KOL/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Feb 2026
Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) of the Act was filed on 07.01.2025 in Form 10AB. We also find\nthat the assessee had already commenced activities from 2022-23 but\nthe the ld. CIT(E) rejected the final approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act on the\nground that the assessee filed Form 10AB on 07.01.2025, which is\nbeyond the stipulated time limit. We have

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1084/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Shri Sourabh Soparkar, Advocate Represented by Department : Dr. Narendra Kumar N

Showing 1–20 of 1,952 · Page 1 of 98

...
14
Condonation of Delay14
Section 1012
For Appellant:
For Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR Date of Conclusion of Hearing : 11/11/2025
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

charitable trust u/s 80G(2)(iv) read with section 80G(1)(ii) of the Act. 23. As discussed supra, we concur with the contention of the assessee that since Parliament intended certain restrictions to only CSR expenditure in respect of two donations included by an assessee as CSR expenditure i.e. [Swachh Bharat Kosh and Clean Ganga Fund] has impliedly

AMRUT PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD 1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7387/MUM/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2026-27

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokaramrut Public Charitable Ito Exemption Trust Ward 1(1), Block 4, Plot No. 578A, Vs. Cumballa Hill, Jitendra Bldg, Pedder Road, Jamejamshed Road, Mumbai-400 026 Matunga, Mumbai- 400 019 Pan/Gir No.Aaata4810A (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri P. P. Jayaraman, Ld. Ar Revenue By Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Ld. Dr Date Of Hearing 13.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 19.01.2026

Section 12ASection 80G(5)

5) would remain valid co-terminus with the registration under section 12A, i.e. up to A.Y. 2026–27. On account of this mistaken understanding, the assessee did not file 6 Amrut Public Charitable Trust the application in Form No. 10AB within the period contemplated under clause (iii) of the first proviso to section 80G

SHRI RAJESH RAVINDRAN CHARITY TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jan 2026

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Divatia & Shri Samir VoraFor Respondent: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT.DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 8G(5)

trust would be religious and not charitable and the assessee would not be entitled to the benefits of Section 80G of the Act de hors the fact that it has not expended more than 5% of its income on religious activities as provided for 80G(5B) of the Act. 15. We have gone through the said decision and we find

KHANDESH MARATHA MANDAL,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1302/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Abhilash HiranFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

trust is on 07/10/2024 i.e. after the expiry of period under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. Thus, it is seen that the assessee has failed to file the present application within the time limit allowed under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Income

DECCAN GYMKHANA,PUNE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 444/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Sharad A Vaze &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

charitable institution in the Statute. Considering the above, it is but natural that in case of an assessee who has already commenced its activities and intends to get approved under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act, has to first get provisionally approved under section 80G(5)(vi) by making an application under clause (iv) of first proviso to section

DECCAN GYMKHANA,DECCAN vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1554/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Sharad A Vaze &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

charitable institution in the Statute. Considering the above, it is but natural that in case of an assessee who has already commenced its activities and intends to get approved under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act, has to first get provisionally approved under section 80G(5)(vi) by making an application under clause (iv) of first proviso to section

ANANDABAVA SEVA SANSTHA GAUSHALA TRUST JAMNAGAR,JAMNAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 31/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 31/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2024-25) (Hybrid Hearing) Anandbava Seva Sanstha Gaushala Trust, The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Gopal Bhuvan No, Anandbava Chakalo, Tax (E), Jamnagar 361001 Ahmedabad 380015 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaata2817K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Sr. (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 22/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 21/10/2025

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Sr. (DR)
Section 2(15)Section 80(5)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

section 80G i.e. the object of trust is not a purely charitable trust and hence not entitled to get approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act. The learned CIT(E) may kindly be directed to grant registration u/s. 80G(5)(iii

HDFC BANK LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2 (3) (1), MUMBAI

ITA 1555/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Oct 2025AY 2019-20
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 14A

iii) in accordance with the ratio of law laid down by Special\nBench-ITAT, Delhi in the case of Vireet Investment Private Limited\n(supra). This ground is therefore dismissed.\n16. In the ground no.2, it is claimed by the Revenue the Ld.\nCIT(A) erred in restricting the disallowance u/s 14A to the exempt\nincome ignoring the provisions contained

SOCIETY FOR COMMUNITY ORGANISATION AND PEOPLES EDUCATION (SCOPE),TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1127/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1127/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: - Society For Community Organization Commissioner Of Income Tax & Peoples Education (Scope), (Exemptions), No.17, 16Th Cross, Ahmed Colony, Chennai. Ramalinga Nagar, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu- 620 003. [Pan: Aaets3488C] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri N.Arjun Raj, Advocate, प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri N.Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

PROTECT AND RESCUE ANIMALS IN NEED INITIATIVE (PRANI),CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1151/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1151/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: - Protect & Rescue Animals In Need Commissioner Of Income Tax Initiative (Prani), (Exemptions), No.10, Door No.5, Bnb Flats, Chennai. 6Th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai- 600 083. [Pan: Aaftp0832N] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri M.Viswanathan, C.A. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri M.Viswanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

PRAYATNA CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 374/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Sept 2025

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri D.K. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT- DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Charitable Trust, in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act), and simultaneously

SHRI SATYA KABIR SAHEB NI GADI,JAMNAGAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 129/RJT/2025[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Aug 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.129/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: N.A. Shri Kabir Kirti Mandir Kashi The Commissioner Of Income बनाम Kabir Ashram Road Tax (Exemption) Kabir Para Road Vs. Anandnagar Outside Khambalia Gate Ahmedabad. Jamnagar. Pan : Aabts0260M (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) : (""यथ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By. : Shri Dushyant Maharshi, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 09/06/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28/08/2025 Order Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Wherein The Commissioner Has Denied The Approval Under Section 80G(5)(Iii) Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act') & Rejected The Assessee’S Application Filed In Form No.10Ab For Approval In Clause (Iii) Of First Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: “1. Hon. Cit(Exemption) Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Rejecting The Registration U/S. 80G(5) By Contending That Major Activities Of Assessee Are Religious In Nature. Hon. Cit(Exemption) Has Not Appreciated The Facts That Although Having Some Of The Shri Kabir Kirti Mandir Kashi

For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, ld. CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable objects and also furnished note on activities carried out by trust.” 3. Brief facts qua the issue are that assessee filed an application for approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

RATLAM AHINSA SHIKSHA SAMITI,RATLAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 719/IND/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Aug 2025AY 2024-25
Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 80G(5)

section 80G(5) [“clause (iii)”]. Therefore, the present matter needs to be remanded to back to the file of CIT(E) for adjudication afresh with a direction that the assessee's application be considered and decided in terms of “clause (iii)”.\n6. Ld. AR relied upon following decisions of ITAT benches wherein the situations identical to assessee's facts have

SETH MAHAVEER KUMAR SUSHILA DEVI JAIN CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1084/KOL/2025[----]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Aug 2025

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) of First Proviso to section 80G(5). Such institutions are required to apply for final registration at least six months prior to expiry of the period of provisional approval or within six months of commencement of 4 I.T.A. No. 1084/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: ….. Seth Mahaveer Kumar Sushila Devi Jain Charitable Trust

CENTURY RAYON EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMP), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 947/PUN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri S.M. BandiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

charitable institution in the Statute. Considering the above, it is but natural that in case of an assessee who has already commenced its activities and intends to get approved under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act, has to first get provisionally approved under section 80G(5)(vi) by making an application under clause (iv) of first proviso to section

KALYAN CHARITY TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMP), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 946/PUN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri S.M. BandiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

charitable institution in the Statute. Considering the above, it is but natural that in case of an assessee who has already commenced its activities and intends to get approved under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act, has to first get provisionally approved under section 80G(5)(vi) by making an application under clause (iv) of first proviso to section

THE SORABJEE NUSSERWANJEE PARUCK PARSI POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

ITA 490/SRT/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jul 2025
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Section 80G is not\navailable. In view of these facts the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the applications for\napproval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act and cancelled the provisional approval\ngranted earlier.\n12.\nAggrieved by these orders of Ld. CIT(E), the assessee-trusts submitted\nthat the CIT(E) has drawn the inference without considering the details,\ndocuments

AHIR SAMAJ TRUST,PORBANDAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 49/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.49/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: N.A. बनाम Ahir Samaj Trust Principal Commissioner Of Income- At Bhoddar, Dist. Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad /Vs. Porbandar-360 570 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaita 1524 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By. : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 09/07/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, [In Short “Ld.Cit(E)”] Wherein Ld. Cit(E) Denied The Approval Of The Assessee U/S. 80G(5)(Ii) Of The Act & Rejected The Assessee’S Application In Form 10Ab For Approval U/S. 80G(5)(Iii) Of The Act, Holding That Assessee Trust Has Violated The Main Condition Of Sub-Section 5 Of Section 80G Of The Act, As The Assessee- Trust Is Not A Purely Charitable Trust.

For Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR
Section 5Section 5BSection 80(5)(iii)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

section 80G i.e. the object of trust is not a purely charitable trust and hence not entitled to get approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act. The learned CIT(E) may kindly be directed to grant registration u/s. 80G(5)(iii

SHRI UMIYA MATAJI ISHVER RAMJI ANNAKSHETRA TRUST,BHUJ KUTCH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose, in above terms

ITA 116/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.116/Rjt/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: N.A. Shri Umiya Mataji Ishver Ramji Commissioner Of Income- बनाम Annakshetra Trust Tax(Exemption), Ahmedabad, Vadhay At Deshalpar Vandhay Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Vs. Taluka Bhuj Kutch-370 001 Ayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Pan : Aabts 8429 C Nr. Sacin Tower 100 Ft Road, Anandnagar Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-3800 015 (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

iii) of first proviso to Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) holding that the assessee-trust has violated main conditions of subsection (5) of section 80G, Shri Umiya Mataji Ishver Ramji Annakshetra Trust 2 that is, assessee-trust is not a purely charitable