KALPSARU DIAMONDS ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 23(2), MUMBAI
In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee as well as In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee as well as Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 3223/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2024AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Years: 2012-13 Kalpsaru Diamonds, Acit 23(2), Jw 8040/250, Bharat Diamond Piramal Chambers, Vs. Bourse, Bkc, Bandra East, Mumbai-400013. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aaafk 6960 H Appellant Respondent Assessment Years: 2012-13 Dy. Cit-23(1), Kalpsaru Diamonds, Room No. 511, Fifth Floor, Jw 8040/250, Bharat Diamond Piramal Chambers, Parel, Vs. Bourse, Bkc, Bandra East, Lalbaugh-400012. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aaafk 6960 H Appellant Respondent
For Respondent: Mr. Ajay Singh
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C
80,130/-. The return of income filed eturn of income filed by the assessee was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, by the assessee was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income by the assessee was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income
1961 (in short ‘the Act’) on 10.05.2013. Subsequently, The 1961 (in short
