BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,117 results for “TDS”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai491Delhi424Bangalore264Kolkata126Hyderabad113Jaipur97Chennai96Patna79Chandigarh58Raipur46Visakhapatnam41Ahmedabad37Indore34Pune34Rajkot26Lucknow22Nagpur18Agra16Cochin16Panaji16Guwahati13Surat12Jodhpur11Allahabad7Ranchi5Amritsar4Varanasi4Dehradun2Jabalpur2Telangana1Karnataka1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)90Survey u/s 133A75Section 133A74Section 20166TDS59Section 194C51Section 143(3)41Addition to Income37Section 6835Deduction31Section 147

ACIT 21(2) vs. ORIENTAL DECORATORS, MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 820/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No. 820/Mum/2015 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10)

For Appellant: Shri. Hari.S. RahejaFor Respondent: Shri. Rajat Mittal
Section 133ASection 143(3)

133A which was later on retracted. In the absence of any other corroborative evidence placed on record by the AO to support the additions made, such addition made cannot be sustained and hence additions made amounting to Rs. 58,00,000/- is hereby deleted. 50. Regarding the instances of additions made in the case of the appellant

DCIT , TDS CIRCLE , COIMBATORE vs. M/S KOVAI MEDICAL CENTRE AND HOSPITAL LIMITED , COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 2,117 · Page 1 of 106

...
27
Section 153A26
ITA 1004/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1004/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Kovai Medical Centre & Income Tax, V. Hospital Limited, Tds Circle, 99 Avinashi Road, Coimbatore. Coimbatore - 641 014. [Pan: Aaack-9192-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. M. Rajan, Cit -Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri. M. Rajan, CIT -DRFor Respondent: Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate
Section 133ASection 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS u/s. 201(1) and interest thereon u/s. 201(1A) of the Act is survey conducted u/s. 133A(2A) of the Act on 22.11.2021, in the business

KESARWANI MARKETING(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 373/ALLD/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad01 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Shri UtkarshFor Respondent: Shri Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 40

survey u/s 133A on 27.08.2009, which assessee is required to explain. Principles of natural justice also demand that all the relied upon seized/impounded material as well relied upon statements recorded be also provided to assessee for rebuttal (if not yet provided but relied upon during set aside proceedings to cause prejudice to assessee), before any prejudice is caused

M/S KESARWANI MARKETING (P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT (OSD), ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 154/ALLD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad01 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Shri UtkarshFor Respondent: Shri Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 40

survey u/s 133A on 27.08.2009, which assessee is required to explain. Principles of natural justice also demand that all the relied upon seized/impounded material as well relied upon statements recorded be also provided to assessee for rebuttal (if not yet provided but relied upon during set aside proceedings to cause prejudice to assessee), before any prejudice is caused

ITO 22(1)-2, NAVI MUMBAI vs. J V CHEM (INDIA), MUMBAI

In the result , both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed, as indicated above

ITA 3763/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3786/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), Ito 22(1)(2), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Building, Ghatkopar East, Vashi, Mumbai- 400077 Navi Mumbai स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aabfj4268L आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3763/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Ito 22(1)(2), बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station Building, R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Vashi, Ghatkopar East, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400077 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabfj4268L (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. Rajeev Gubgotra (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 40Section 41

133A, 15 person came at the office premises (a tiny space of l80sq feet) for making the survey, consisting of ITO’s/ADC1T and staff of 1TO. The search commenced in afternoon and was completed in early morning to next day. During the survey operation all record of assessee was mixed in a very small place and there was a total

J.V. CHEM (INDIA),MUMBAI vs. ITO 22(1)2, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result , both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed, as indicated above

ITA 3786/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3786/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), Ito 22(1)(2), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Building, Ghatkopar East, Vashi, Mumbai- 400077 Navi Mumbai स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aabfj4268L आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3763/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Ito 22(1)(2), बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station Building, R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Vashi, Ghatkopar East, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400077 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabfj4268L (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. Rajeev Gubgotra (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 40Section 41

133A, 15 person came at the office premises (a tiny space of l80sq feet) for making the survey, consisting of ITO’s/ADC1T and staff of 1TO. The search commenced in afternoon and was completed in early morning to next day. During the survey operation all record of assessee was mixed in a very small place and there was a total

ACIT, CC-3, SURAT vs. SHRI NARESH NEMCHAND SHAH, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 197/SRT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.197/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2012-13) (Physical Court Hearing) The Acit, Central Cir.-3, Vs. Naresh Nemchand Shah, Surat. Abhishek House, Bh. Jeevan Bharti School, Kadampali Society, Nanpura, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acrps 0182 J (Assessee)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Assessee)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

survey u/s 133A of the Act. The assessee provided bank account of the creditor with audited accounts. 27. The ld CIT(A) noted that assessee paid interest through regular banking channels to the creditor. The TDS

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 903/MUM/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 904/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 862/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 864/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 863/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 906/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 905/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6425/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, Ld. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Mahesh Pamnani, Ld. Sr. D.R
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 201(1)Section 250

TDS u/s 194C of the Act, but not u/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below. 13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs namely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR vs. JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 197/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Hemang Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT (through V.C.) a
Section 133ASection 271(1)(c)

133A was carried out on 09.12.2014 i.e.before the close of the relevant previous year, during which, the assessee admitted income of Rs. 3.94 ITA No. 267, 196 & 197/JPR/2024 17 Shri Nath Corporation & Ors., Jaipur. cr./- and including the same, ROA was filed u/s 139(1) on 15.09.2015 at total income of Rs. 3,95,19,200/-which was a voluntary

SWASTIK REALTORS,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 15(3), MUMBAI

ITA 800/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.800/Mum/2012 & 6314/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 & 2008-09) Swastik Realtors The Assistant बनाम/ 312, Swastik Disha Commissioner Of Income V. Corporate Park , Kohinoor Tax – 15(3), Textile Printing Compound Matru Mandir I T Office Opp. Shreyas Cinema, Lbs Nana Chowk Marg, Ghatkopar(W) Grant Road Mumbai-400 086 Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Abafs2576A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

survey carried out u/s 133A of the Act on Moxdiam , certain books of accounts and loose sheets were impounded on 09-07-2008 . It was submitted by said Mr. Nitesh Jain that statement of Mr. Basant D. Jain was recorded u/s 131 of the Act dated 09- 07-2008 which was duly acknowledged and endorsed by Mr Nitesh Jain whereby

SWASTIK REALTORS,MUMBAI vs. A.C.I.T.15(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6314/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.800/Mum/2012 & 6314/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 & 2008-09) Swastik Realtors The Assistant बनाम/ 312, Swastik Disha Commissioner Of Income V. Corporate Park , Kohinoor Tax – 15(3), Textile Printing Compound Matru Mandir I T Office Opp. Shreyas Cinema, Lbs Nana Chowk Marg, Ghatkopar(W) Grant Road Mumbai-400 086 Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Abafs2576A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

survey carried out u/s 133A of the Act on Moxdiam , certain books of accounts and loose sheets were impounded on 09-07-2008 . It was submitted by said Mr. Nitesh Jain that statement of Mr. Basant D. Jain was recorded u/s 131 of the Act dated 09- 07-2008 which was duly acknowledged and endorsed by Mr Nitesh Jain whereby

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA , JAIPUR vs. SHRI NATH CORPORATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 267/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Sept 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Hemang Gargieya, Adv. &
Section 133ASection 271(1)(c)

133A was carried out on 09.12.2014 i.e.before the close of the relevant previous year, during which, the assessee admitted income of Rs.3.94\ncr./- and including the same, ROA was filed u/s 139(1) on 15.09.2015 at total income of Rs.3,95,19,200/-which was a voluntary declaration.\n3.2 The very fact of the assessee declaring additional income during

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAIPUR vs. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 196/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Sept 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Hemang Gargieya, Adv. &
Section 133ASection 271(1)(c)

133A was carried out on 09.12.2014 i.e.before the close of\nthe relevant previous year, during which, the assessee admitted income of Rs.3.94\ncr./- and including the same, ROA was filed u/s 139(1) on 15.09.2015 at total\nincome of Rs.3,95,19,200/-which was a voluntary declaration.\n3.2\nThe very fact of the assessee declaring additional income during