Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

864 results for “TDS”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi241 Mumbai162 Bangalore99 Kolkata58 Karnataka47 Raipur42 Jaipur30 Cochin28 Ahmedabad23 Chandigarh14 Jodhpur12 Indore12 Nagpur10 Lucknow10 Chennai9 Hyderabad8 Telangana7 Visakhapatnam7 Varanasi6 Surat6 Agra5 Jabalpur5 Panaji5 Pune3 Dehradun3 Ranchi3 SC3 Orissa2 Rajkot2 Kerala1 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 271C188 Section 201(1)137 TDS89 Section 194C69 Deduction68 Section 20167 Penalty67 Section 4047 Section 194A30 Addition to Income30 Section 250

M/S US TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-007934-007934 - 2011Supreme Court10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 201Section 271C

Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non deduction TDS and no penalty is envisaged under Section 271C for belated

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2680/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201

Showing 1–20 of 864 · Page 1 of 44

...

28

Section 201(1)

Section 250(6)

Section 271C

Section 272A(2)(g)

TDS), with penalty under section 271C of the Act being levied for not depositing the TDS in time, while that

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2678/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS), with penalty under section 271C of the Act being levied for not depositing the TDS in time, while that

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2679/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS), with penalty under section 271C of the Act being levied for not depositing the TDS in time, while that

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2681/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS), with penalty under section 271C of the Act being levied for not depositing the TDS in time, while that

M/S KUNJ POWER PROJECTS PVT.LTD,MATHURA vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS) , KANPUR, KANPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 152/AGR/2022[2024-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2024-15

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 271C(1)(a)Section 276C

Section 271C of the Income Tax\nAct for non- deduction TDS and no penalty is envisaged\nunder Section 271C for belated

SHREE BASAVESHWAR SUGARS LIMITED ,VIJAYAPURA ( BIJAPUR ) vs. ACIT , PANAJI-GOA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 725/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri P.M. Kathir, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 273B

Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for nondeduction TDS and no penalty is envisaged under Section 271C for belated

HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms, but in the circumstances, with

ITA/194/2004HC Delhi01 Aug 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271

TDS that taxes due have been paid by the deductee-assessee. However, this did not alter the liability to charge interest under Section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee/assessee or the liability for penalty under Section 271C

M/S. SYNDICATE BANK,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessees are allowed

ITA 403/BANG/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R.Baskaran

For Appellant: Mr. S. Ananthan & Ms. Lalitha Rameswaran, CAsFor Respondent: Ms. R. Premi, JCIT SR.DR(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271Section 271C

TDS:- “(iv) On the Scope of Section 271C read with Section 273B: 35. Section 271C inter alia states that if any person

M/S. SYNDICATE BANK,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessees are allowed

ITA 402/BANG/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R.Baskaran

For Appellant: Mr. S. Ananthan & Ms. Lalitha Rameswaran, CAsFor Respondent: Ms. R. Premi, JCIT SR.DR(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271Section 271C

TDS:- “(iv) On the Scope of Section 271C read with Section 273B: 35. Section 271C inter alia states that if any person

M/S. SYNDICATE BANK,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessees are allowed

ITA 404/BANG/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R.Baskaran

For Appellant: Mr. S. Ananthan & Ms. Lalitha Rameswaran, CAsFor Respondent: Ms. R. Premi, JCIT SR.DR(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271Section 271C

TDS:- “(iv) On the Scope of Section 271C read with Section 273B: 35. Section 271C inter alia states that if any person

JCIT, COIMBATORE vs. CHROMA PRINT INDIA PVT . LTD., COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2083/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No.2083/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Joint Commissioner Of M/S. Chroma Print India Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Tds Range, Vs. P.B. No. 5316, 53, Ganesh Nagar, Coimbatore. G.N. Mills Post, Mtp Road, Coimbatore. [Pan:Aaccc6021A] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. Veni Raj, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Coimbatore Dated 30.03.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds In Its Appeal: “1. The Order Of Learned Cit(A) Is Opposed To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Ld Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That No Penalty Is Leviable On The Non Deduction Of Tds On Payment Of Labour Charges Worth

For Appellant: Ms. Veni Raj, JCITFor Respondent: Shri T.N. Seetharaman, Advocate

Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273

TDS Range initiated proceedings under section 271C of the Act by issuing show cause notice. Having not received any response

EID PARRY (INDIA) LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE, PANAJI, PANAJI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in term of aforesaid observation

ITA 36/PAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 35 To 40/Pan/2019 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-2012 To 2016-2017 M/S Eid Parry India Limited Khanpet, Trogal,Tal. : Ramdurg, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka Pan: Aaace 0702 C Tan:Blre 08509 E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ward-1, Belagavi, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Philip George Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; These Present Appeals Filed By The Appellant Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Belagavi [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Ascended Out Of Orders Of The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds Range, Panaji [For Short “Ao”] Passed U/S 271C Of The Act, For Six Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-2012 To 2016-2017. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 18

For Appellant: Mr Philip GeorgeFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak

Section 194CSection 250Section 271C

TDS, the Hon’ble Lordship on the scope of Section 271C r.w.s 273B have observed that; Section 271C inter alia

EID PARRY (INDIA) LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE, PANAJI, PANAJI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in term of aforesaid observation

ITA 39/PAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 35 To 40/Pan/2019 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-2012 To 2016-2017 M/S Eid Parry India Limited Khanpet, Trogal,Tal. : Ramdurg, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka Pan: Aaace 0702 C Tan:Blre 08509 E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ward-1, Belagavi, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Philip George Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; These Present Appeals Filed By The Appellant Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Belagavi [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Ascended Out Of Orders Of The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds Range, Panaji [For Short “Ao”] Passed U/S 271C Of The Act, For Six Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-2012 To 2016-2017. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 18

For Appellant: Mr Philip GeorgeFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak

Section 194CSection 250Section 271C

TDS, the Hon’ble Lordship on the scope of Section 271C r.w.s 273B have observed that; Section 271C inter alia

EID PARRY (INDIA) LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE, PANAJI, PANAJI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in term of aforesaid observation

ITA 37/PAN/2019[2013/14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Apr 2022

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 35 To 40/Pan/2019 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-2012 To 2016-2017 M/S Eid Parry India Limited Khanpet, Trogal,Tal. : Ramdurg, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka Pan: Aaace 0702 C Tan:Blre 08509 E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ward-1, Belagavi, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Philip George Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; These Present Appeals Filed By The Appellant Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Belagavi [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Ascended Out Of Orders Of The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds Range, Panaji [For Short “Ao”] Passed U/S 271C Of The Act, For Six Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-2012 To 2016-2017. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 18

For Appellant: Mr Philip GeorgeFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak

Section 194CSection 250Section 271C

TDS, the Hon’ble Lordship on the scope of Section 271C r.w.s 273B have observed that; Section 271C inter alia

EID PARRY (INDIA) LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE, PANAJI, PANAJI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in term of aforesaid observation

ITA 35/PAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 35 To 40/Pan/2019 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-2012 To 2016-2017 M/S Eid Parry India Limited Khanpet, Trogal,Tal. : Ramdurg, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka Pan: Aaace 0702 C Tan:Blre 08509 E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ward-1, Belagavi, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Philip George Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; These Present Appeals Filed By The Appellant Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Belagavi [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Ascended Out Of Orders Of The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds Range, Panaji [For Short “Ao”] Passed U/S 271C Of The Act, For Six Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-2012 To 2016-2017. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 18

For Appellant: Mr Philip GeorgeFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak

Section 194CSection 250Section 271C

TDS, the Hon’ble Lordship on the scope of Section 271C r.w.s 273B have observed that; Section 271C inter alia

EID PARRY (INDIA) LTD.,BELAGAVI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE, PANAJI, PANAJI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in term of aforesaid observation

ITA 38/PAN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. : 35 To 40/Pan/2019 करधििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-2012 To 2016-2017 M/S Eid Parry India Limited Khanpet, Trogal,Tal. : Ramdurg, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka Pan: Aaace 0702 C Tan:Blre 08509 E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ward-1, Belagavi, Dist. : Belagavi, Karnataka . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Philip George Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; These Present Appeals Filed By The Appellant Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Appeals, Belagavi [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which In Turn Ascended Out Of Orders Of The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds Range, Panaji [For Short “Ao”] Passed U/S 271C Of The Act, For Six Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-2012 To 2016-2017. Itat-Panaji Page 1 Of 18

For Appellant: Mr Philip GeorgeFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak

Section 194CSection 250Section 271C

TDS, the Hon’ble Lordship on the scope of Section 271C r.w.s 273B have observed that; Section 271C inter alia

M/S SYNDICATE BANK ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) RANGE-3 , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 653/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri M. Dheeraj, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271

TDS:- “(iv) On the Scope of Section 271C read with Section 273B: 35. Section 271C inter alia states that if any person

M/S SYNDICATE BANK ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) RANGE-3 , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 654/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri M. Dheeraj, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271

TDS:- “(iv) On the Scope of Section 271C read with Section 273B: 35. Section 271C inter alia states that if any person

M/S SYNDICATE BANK ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) RANGE-3 , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 651/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri M. Dheeraj, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271

TDS:- “(iv) On the Scope of Section 271C read with Section 273B: 35. Section 271C inter alia states that if any person