BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,466 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi593Mumbai546Kolkata291Bangalore273Chennai159Jaipur85Ahmedabad70Hyderabad60Indore40Raipur38Karnataka27Pune26Rajkot22Jodhpur22Chandigarh20Patna19Cochin17Nagpur16Surat14Amritsar12Visakhapatnam11Guwahati11Panaji11Cuttack10Ranchi9Lucknow9Kerala8Jabalpur8Allahabad8Calcutta7Telangana6Agra5SC5Dehradun3Rajasthan2Orissa1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194C122TDS64Section 4063Addition to Income58Section 201(1)48Section 20146Disallowance46Deduction45Section 143(3)42Section 153C40Section 194I

ACIT, CIRCLE, BHARATPUR vs. M/S. JAGDAMBE STONE COMPANY, BHARATPUR

In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1171/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Gupta (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Rooni Paul (Addl.CIT-DR) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(2)Section 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

TDS under the provision of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act? 5. Whether the provision of section 194C(6) & 194C

ITO WARD-1(1) NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. ASHWAMI SALES AND MARKETING PVT.LTD, NAGPUR

Showing 1–20 of 2,466 · Page 1 of 124

...
30
Section 14819

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 294/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh P. ShahFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 143(1)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

TDS u/s 194C. Needless to say that subject to compliance with the provisions of Section 194C(6), immunity from TDS

ACIT 16(1), MUMBAI vs. UTV ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION LTD(NOW KNOWN AS M/S.DISNEY BROADCASTING (INDIA) LIMITED), MUMBAI

ITA 5958/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.N Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.5958/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) बिाम/ Acit 16(1) Utv Entertainment R.No. 439, Aayakar Television Ltd. (Now Bhavan, M.K Marg, Known As M/S. Disney V. Mumbai 400020 Broadcasting (India) Ltd.) 11, Solitaire Corporate Park, Guru Hargovind Marg, Chakala , Mumbai-400093 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aaccv4782D (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue By: Shri. Charanjeet Singh Gulati (Cit-Dr) Shri. Abhishek Tilak Assessee By: सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 11.03.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.06.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Revenue, Being Ita No. 5958/Mum/2017, Is Directed Against Appellate Order Dated 16.06.2017, Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”), For Assessment Year 2012-13, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From The Assessment Order Dated 15.03.2016 Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”) For Ay 2012-13. I.T.A. No.5958/Mum/2017

For Respondent: Shri. Charanjeet Singh Gulati
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194JSection 40Section 9(1)(vi)

TDS as per provisions of section 194C. Section 194C covers Broadcasting and Telecasting work under the works contract and thus

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

C.A. No.-007865-007865 - 2009Supreme Court29 Jul 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 40

Section 194C of the Act. He further stated that it is not practical to deduct tax at source while making payment to a truck owner/ operator because no truck owner accepts payment after TDS

INFOOBJECTS SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1499/JPR/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Apr 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 1499/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2021-22 Infoobjects Software India Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Private Ltd. Income Tax, 5-E Patrikayan, 3rd Floor Jhalana Circle-04, Jaipur Institutional Area, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AABCI8663B अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से/ Assessee by : Sh. Naman Maloo, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by

For Appellant: Sh. Naman Maloo, CAFor Respondent: Sh. P. P. Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 201Section 40Section 92B(2)

section 194C of the Act and accordingly not liable for TDS. Relevant extract of section 194C of the Act is as under

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5,KOKATA vs. M/S. L.G.W. LTD

ITA/35/2020HC Calcutta12 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : August 12, 2022 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ….For Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananda Sen, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act, For Brevity) Is Directed Against The Order Of The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) Dated 5Th October, 2018 In I.T.A. No.1786/Kol/2016 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration: - A) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Tribunal Has Misinterpreted Section 194C, More Particularly 194C (7) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Read With Rule 31A Of The Income

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 200Section 234Section 260ASection 31Section 31ASection 48Section 6

section 194C, more particularly 194C (7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 31A of the Income 2 Tax Rules, 1962 in holding that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS

THE ACIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S PRAKASH OILS LTD., DHAR

In the result, the above captioned appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the

ITA 235/IND/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Tulsian, CA &For Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT, DR
Section 147

Section 194C(6), immunity from TDS under sec. 194C(1) of the Act in relation to payments to transporters, applies

THE ACIT ,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S PRAKASH OILS LTD., DHAR

In the result, the above captioned appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the

ITA 226/IND/2021[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Tulsian, CA &For Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT, DR
Section 147

Section 194C(6), immunity from TDS under sec. 194C(1) of the Act in relation to payments to transporters, applies

THE ADDL. CIT RANGE -1, INDORE vs. M/S PRAKASH OILS LTD., DHAR

In the result, the above captioned appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the

ITA 227/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Tulsian, CA &For Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT, DR
Section 147

Section 194C(6), immunity from TDS under sec. 194C(1) of the Act in relation to payments to transporters, applies

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6422/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), DAVANGERE vs. M/S MUURUGARAJENDRA OIL INDUSTRY PVT LTD , CHITRADURGA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2094/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boazassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CITFor Respondent: Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate
Section 194(6)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

TDS u/s 194C. Needless to say that subject to compliance with the provisions of Section 194C(6), immunity from TDS

M/S CEAT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OSD TDS CIRLCE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6419/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2013-14
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6421/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2015-16
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor

M/S CEAT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6424/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor

INCOME TAX OFFIECER-17(3)(4), MUMBAI vs. SUGARCHEM, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 2071/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalincome Tax Officer-17(3)(4) M/S. Sugarchem 1St Floor, Aayakar Bhavan Kshamalaya, 3Rd Floor Vs. M.K. Road, Mumbai 400020 Marine Lines Mumbai 400020 Pan – Aayfs3762P Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Purushotttam KumarFor Respondent: Shri Bhpendra Shah
Section 143(3)Section 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

TDS was deductible on the payments made as the transporters have furnished their PAN details to the assessee as per provisions of Section 194C

M/S TATA PROJECTS LTD.,,NOIDA vs. ACIT (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4403/DEL/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Smt Suchitra Kamblei.T.A .No.-4403/Del/2016 (A.Y 2014-15) & I.T.A .No.-4404/Del/2016 (A.Y 2015-16)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194C(7)Section 201Section 3Section 6

TDS u/s 201(1) read with Section 194C and directed to deposit the TDS as per the provisions of Section

M/S TATA PROJECTS LTD.,,NOIDA vs. ACIT (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4404/DEL/2016[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2016AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Smt Suchitra Kamblei.T.A .No.-4403/Del/2016 (A.Y 2014-15) & I.T.A .No.-4404/Del/2016 (A.Y 2015-16)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194C(7)Section 201Section 3Section 6

TDS u/s 201(1) read with Section 194C and directed to deposit the TDS as per the provisions of Section

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6425/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2019-20
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor

M/S CEAT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6423/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6420/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2014-15
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

Section 194C as compared to other TDS provisions. As\nper Section 194C, any person making payment to any resident\nfor