Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6,419 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,721 Mumbai1,311 Bangalore646 Pune522 Chennai433 Ahmedabad249 Hyderabad232 Raipur201 Jaipur169 Kolkata159 Chandigarh132 Visakhapatnam80 Nagpur79 Indore61 Rajkot48 Lucknow47 Cochin45 Cuttack44 Surat42 Jodhpur37 Dehradun30 Guwahati24 Agra22 Patna16 Panaji15 Amritsar15 Jabalpur13 SC13 Ranchi8 Allahabad4 Varanasi1

Key Topics

TDS55 Addition to Income55 Section 14854 Penalty35 Section 4033 Section 271(1)(c)31 Section 143(3)29 Section 14729 Disallowance29 Section 80I28 Section 250

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2681/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

penalty for the default in the delay in deposit of TDS also, besides levying of penalty for non-deduction of TDS

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 6,419 · Page 1 of 321

...

24

ITA 2679/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

penalty for the default in the delay in deposit of TDS also, besides levying of penalty for non-deduction of TDS

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2680/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

penalty for the default in the delay in deposit of TDS also, besides levying of penalty for non-deduction of TDS

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2678/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

penalty for the default in the delay in deposit of TDS also, besides levying of penalty for non-deduction of TDS

NATIONAL COMMODITY AND DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE ADDITIONAL JOINT DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 342/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2017-18 National Commodity & The Asst. Cit-15(2)(1), Derivatives Exchange Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Vs. First Floor, Ackruti Corporate Karve Road, Churchgate, Park, Lbs Marg, Near Ge Mumbai-400020. Garden, Kanjurmarg (W), Mumbai-400078. Pan No. Aabcn 7696 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2018-19 National Commodity & The Additional Derivatives Exchange Ltd., /Joint/Deputy/Asst. Cit15(2)(1), First Floor, Ackruti Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Corporate Park, Lbs Marg, Road, Churchgate, Near Ge Garden, Mumbai-400020. Kanurmarg (W), Mumbai-400078. Pan No. Aabcn 7696 K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Abdul Kadir JawadwalaFor Respondent: Mr. Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr

penalty (including TDS) to transfers the entire gross , amount of penalty (including TDS) to transfers the entire gross , amount of penalty

NATIONAL COMMODITY AND DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 344/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2017-18 National Commodity & The Asst. Cit-15(2)(1), Derivatives Exchange Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Vs. First Floor, Ackruti Corporate Karve Road, Churchgate, Park, Lbs Marg, Near Ge Mumbai-400020. Garden, Kanjurmarg (W), Mumbai-400078. Pan No. Aabcn 7696 K Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2018-19 National Commodity & The Additional Derivatives Exchange Ltd., /Joint/Deputy/Asst. Cit15(2)(1), First Floor, Ackruti Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Corporate Park, Lbs Marg, Road, Churchgate, Near Ge Garden, Mumbai-400020. Kanurmarg (W), Mumbai-400078. Pan No. Aabcn 7696 K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Abdul Kadir JawadwalaFor Respondent: Mr. Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr

penalty (including TDS) to transfers the entire gross , amount of penalty (including TDS) to transfers the entire gross , amount of penalty

M/S JAS TELECOM PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-16 , BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by assessee stands allowed partly

ITA 3251/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, Addl.CIT

Section 200Section 200(3)Section 271BSection 272A(2)(k)Section 274

TDS Interest Total of penalty - Penalty (Page 31-34) TDS return in U/s 220 penalty May 2013 (Page 19) days

MR. SABLE YASHWANT LAXMAN,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS RG, THANE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4240/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Nov 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh () & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman () Assessment Year: 2009-10 Mr. Sable Yashwant Laxman, Addl. Cit- Tds Range, Sable Appartments, Shantinagar, Vs. Thane. Next To Hotel Maharaja, Old Mumbai, Khopoli-410 203. Pan No. Pnes 09546 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Viraj Mehta, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Yashwant Bhaskar, Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 12/11/2021

For Appellant: Mr. Viraj Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Yashwant Bhaskar, DR

Section 143(3)Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

Penalty-Non-filing of TDS returns-Penalty technical in nature as TDS deposited within due date as the delay in filing

M/S US TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-007934-007934 - 2011Supreme Court10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 201Section 271C

penalty is envisaged under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non deduction TDS and no penalty is envisaged

THE BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (TDS) 2, MUMBAI

In the result , the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 1999/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.1999/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12) बिाम/ The Board Of Control For Acit (Tds) 2 Cricket In India, R.No. 701, 7 Th Floor, Wankhede Stadium, Smt. K.G. Mittal V. “D” Road, Churchgate, Ayurvedic Hospital Mumbai 400020 Bldg., Charni Road, Mumbai-400002 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aaatb0186A (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee By: Shri. Nitesh Joshi Shri. Anil Sathe Revenue By : Shri. D.G Pansari , Dr सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 05.09.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 05.10.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Assessee, Being Ita No. 1999/Mum/2017, Is Directed Against Appellate Order Date 10.01.2017 Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-60, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”), For Assessment Year 2011-12, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From Penalty Order Dated 16.12.2011 Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) U/S 272A(2)(K) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”) For Ay 2011-12. I.T.A. No.1999/Mum/2017

For Appellant: Shri. Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri. D.G Pansari , DR

Section 200(3)Section 206Section 272Section 272A(2)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

TDS to the credit of the Central Government within the due dates specified by the Act and the Rules. 4. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the penalty

BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, ADMINISTRETIVE OFFICE,KANPUR vs. ACIT (TDS), KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 490/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Section 10(5)Section 250Section 271CSection 273B

penalty passed by the Ld. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) dated 19-09-2023 U/s 271C of the Act is bad in law and void

STATE BANK OF INDIA, OVERSEAS BRANCH,KANPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 488/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Section 10(5)Section 250Section 271CSection 273B

penalty passed by the Ld. Additional Commissioner of\nIncome Tax (TDS) dated 19-09-2023 U/s 271C of the Act is bad\nin law and void

STATE BANK OF INDIA, OVERSEAS BRANCH,KANPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 487/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Section 10(5)Section 250Section 271CSection 273B

penalty passed by the Ld. Additional Commissioner of\nIncome Tax (TDS) dated 19-09-2023 U/s 271C of the Act is bad\nin law and void

BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, ADMINISTRETIVE OFFICE,KANPUR vs. ACIT (TDS), KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 491/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Section 10(5)Section 250Section 271CSection 273B

penalty passed by the Ld. Additional Commissioner of\nIncome Tax (TDS) dated 19-09-2023 U/s 271C of the Act is bad\nin law and void

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 186/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 181/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 182/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSADY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDSINCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 183/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 184/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 185/JPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee