Search: transfer pricing

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 92Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai60 Delhi42 Kolkata14 Ahmedabad13 Hyderabad11 Jaipur9 Chennai6 Visakhapatnam5 Pune4 Chandigarh3 Bangalore3 Indore2 Rajkot2 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7 Section 92C7 Section 143(2)5 Section 92E5 Section 92B(1)5 Section 143(1)3 Transfer Pricing3 Section 133(6)2

LEWEK ALTAIR SHIPPING PRIVATE LIMITED,KAKINADA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 41/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Jitendra Singh, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao

Section 115VSection 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92CSection 92E

Transfer Pricing regulations do not apply to the assessee and hence no reference should have been made to the Ld. TPO U/s. 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, the reference made by the Ld. AO is bad in law. 1.3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. TPO / Ld. AO and further

LEWEK ALTAIR SHIPPING PRIVATE LIMITED,KAKINADA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

LEWEK ALTAIR SHIPPING PRIVATE LIMITED,KAKINADA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY