Search: transfer pricing

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai97 Delhi54 Chandigarh52 Kolkata22 Bangalore14 Jaipur13 Hyderabad11 Chennai10 Indore8 Nagpur6 Pune6 Ahmedabad5 Cuttack3 Jodhpur2 Visakhapatnam2 Cochin1 Amritsar1 Allahabad1 Raipur1 SC1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 143(2)4 Section 143(1)2 Section 142(1)2 Section 56(2)(viib)2 Section 682 Unexplained Cash Credit2 Addition to Income2

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. POOSARLA SATYAVATHI, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed in limine and Cross objection filed is assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 117/VIZ/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

viib) of the Income tax Act1961, ignoring the method of valuation prescribed under the law. 5. The learned CIT(A) failed to set off the unabsorbed loses of previous years carry forward in the assessment. Page No. 4 I.T.A. No. 227/VIZ/2020 I.T.A. No. 117/VIZ/2021& C.O. No. 13/VIZ/2023 M/s. Linton Projects Private Limited& Smt. Poosarla Satyavathi 6. The appellant

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. POOSARLA SATYAVATHI, VIZIANAGARAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. POOSARLA SATYAVATHI, VIZIANAGARAM

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM