Search: transfer pricing

6 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 50C(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 50C12 Section 1485 Section 143(3)5 Capital Gains5 Long Term Capital Gains4 Deduction3 Section 1442 Section 54F2 Section 36(1)(iii)

APPANA HARI NAGA VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 222/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam06 Feb 2019AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleappana Hari Naga Venkat Rao, Vs. Ito, Ward-1(4), D.No. 15-32-7, Gokul Road, Visakhapatnam. Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Adopa 5287 G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 50CSection 54

transferring the property through sale deed. As per section 50C, it is mandatory to adopt the SRO value as per Stamp Valuation Authority as deemed consideration for arriving at the taxable capital gains. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer adopted the sale price as per section 50C of Rs. 2

APPANA HARI NAGA VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

APPANA HARI NAGA VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

MANNE SUBBA RAO,RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(1), , RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

YADLA SRINIVASA RAO,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2), , VIJAYAWADA

THE ITO,, GUNTUR vs. ALAPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD,, GUNTUR

VARAHALAMMA PYDI (LATE),VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), VISAKHAPATNAM

SRINIVASA HAIR INDUSTRIES,ELURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., ELURU