ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI Y VENKANA CHOUDARY,, VISAKHAPATNAM
In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the cross objection filed by the assessee are partly allowed
ITA 272/VIZ/2018[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Sept 2019AY 2014-2015
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleacit, Circle-4(1), Vs. Y. Venkanna Choudary, Visakhapatnam. D.No. 1-1-2, C/O Anuradha Auto Centre, Sheela Nagar, Nh-5, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aanpy 3003 G (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 108/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 272/Viz/2018) (Asst. Year : 2014-15) Y. Venkanna Choudary, Vs. Acit, Circle-4(1), D.No. 1-1-2, C/O Anuradha Visakhapatnam. Auto Centre, Sheela Nagar, Nh-5, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aanpy 3003 G (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sonawal – CIT DR
Section 56(2)(vii)
price in the hands of the assessee u/sec. 56(2)(vii)(c)(ii) of the Act. Ld.AR relied on the following judicial precedents:-
1)
ACIT Vs. Dr. Rajan Pai [(2016) 48 ITR (Trib.) 170
(Bang.)]
2)
Bharat Hari Singhania & Ors. Vs. CWT & Ors. [(1994)
207 ITR 01]
3)
Sri
Kumar
Pappu
Singh
Vs.
DCIT in ITA
No.270/VIZ/2018, dated
07/12/2018
(ITAT
