Search: transfer pricing

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi224 Mumbai215 Bangalore56 Ahmedabad25 Hyderabad25 Jaipur20 Raipur17 Agra14 Kolkata13 Rajkot12 Pune12 Chennai9 Lucknow6 Nagpur5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam4 Surat3 Cochin2 Jodhpur2 Cuttack1 Ranchi1 Indore1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5 Section 143(2)5 Section 92C5 Section 143(1)3 Section 92E3 Section 92B(1)3 Transfer Pricing3 Section 133(6)2

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 473/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Smt. SuvibhaNolkha, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR

Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92CSection 92E

section 92E, the assessee-company was requested to furnish the details of international transaction in Form No. 3CEB. On receiving the report from the assessee in Form No.3CEB, the same was forwarded to the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing), Hyderabad for computation of Arm’s Length Price [ALP] of the transactions entered into by the assessee with

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

BRANDIX APPARAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 5(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY