BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai100Delhi51Bangalore47Chennai35Hyderabad11Chandigarh10Jaipur10Cuttack7Cochin6Pune5Kolkata5Visakhapatnam3Nagpur3SC2Amritsar1Ahmedabad1Allahabad1Raipur1Rajkot1Guwahati1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 153A12Section 143(2)6Section 686Section 143(3)3Section 1323Section 1393Section 142(1)3Unexplained Cash Credit3TDS3

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 106/VIZ/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 104, 105 & 106/Viz/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Atr Ware Housing (P) Central Circle-2, Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aadca 2121 Q

For Appellant: Sri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

56(2)(viia) of the Act. Accordingly, the Ld. AO computed the income of the assessee under normal provisions and determined the net tax payable at Rs. 49,37,72,670/- and Rs. 31,31,34,641/- under the MAT provisions and passed the assessment order on 29/12/2017 u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Act. 4. Aggrieved

Addition to Income3
Search & Seizure3

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 105/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 104, 105 & 106/Viz/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Atr Ware Housing (P) Central Circle-2, Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aadca 2121 Q

For Appellant: Sri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

56(2)(viia) of the Act. Accordingly, the Ld. AO computed the income of the assessee under normal provisions and determined the net tax payable at Rs. 49,37,72,670/- and Rs. 31,31,34,641/- under the MAT provisions and passed the assessment order on 29/12/2017 u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Act. 4. Aggrieved

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 104/VIZ/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 104, 105 & 106/Viz/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. M/S. Atr Ware Housing (P) Central Circle-2, Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aadca 2121 Q

For Appellant: Sri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

56(2)(viia) of the Act. Accordingly, the Ld. AO computed the income of the assessee under normal provisions and determined the net tax payable at Rs. 49,37,72,670/- and Rs. 31,31,34,641/- under the MAT provisions and passed the assessment order on 29/12/2017 u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Act. 4. Aggrieved