Search: section 68

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 50C5 Section 143(3)4 Section 143(2)3 Capital Gains3 Addition to Income2

CHIGURUPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 202/VIZ/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.202/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-13) Chigurupati Rajendra Prasad Vs. Income Tax Officer Dr.No.32-41-47/28, Near Library Ward-2(2) Machavaram Vijayawada Vijayawada Pan : Abjpc1799A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhukar Aves, DR

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

50C of the Act. The Ld.AR pleaded that the issue in dispute may be remanded back to the AO for fresh evaluation of cost of the immovable property based on the report submitted by the DVO. 7. Per contra, the Ld.DR relied on the order of the Ld.CIT(A), pleaded to uphold the order passed by the Ld.CIT

CHIGURUPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), VIJAYAWADA

CHIGURUPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), VIJAYAWADA

MANNE SUBBA RAO,RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(1), , RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

R.SURYA NARAYNA,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO , WARD - 5(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM