GRANDHI ARAVINDAM,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

68,001/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') by making certain additions. Subsequently, penalty notice u/sec. 274

GRANDHI ARAVINDAM,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

68,001/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') by making certain additions. Subsequently, penalty notice u/sec. 274

GRANDHI ARAVINDAM,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

68,001/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') by making certain additions. Subsequently, penalty notice u/sec. 274

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HARI PRASAD BHARARIA, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue as well as C

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleacit, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sri Hari Prasad Bhararia, Visakhapatnam. B-101, Vuda Apartments, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Ablpb 6853 A (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.43/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 532/Viz/2018) (Asst. Year : 2009-10) Sri Hari Prasad Bhararia, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, B-101, Vuda Apartments, Visakhapatnam. Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Ablpb 6853 A (Appellant) (Respondent)

274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') i.e. for concealment of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income, makes the notice invalid or not? 4. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual deriving income from business of trading in shares, rental income and remuneration

KAKRLA SURYA GANGADHAR TILAK,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.177/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Smt.Kakarla Guna Vidya Saraswathi Vs. Income Tax Officer C/O Kakrla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Ward-3(3) A-1, Janani Apartments Visakhapatnam Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Apjpk5999N] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Sri Kakarla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Vs. Income Tax Officer A-1, Janani Apartments Ward-1(2) Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Visakhapatnam Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ahbpk5319G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri I.Kama Sastry, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)]-1 Visakhapatnam

68,500/-. The immovable property was purchased by the co-owners for a consideration of Rs.24,00,000/- plus stamp duty and registration charges of Rs.5,14,795/- and registered vide document No.2910 of 2005 dated 24.06.2005. A notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) dated 13.03.2014 was issued by the Assessing Officer

KAKARLA GUNA VIDYA SARASWATHI,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.177/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Smt.Kakarla Guna Vidya Saraswathi Vs. Income Tax Officer C/O Kakrla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Ward-3(3) A-1, Janani Apartments Visakhapatnam Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Apjpk5999N] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Sri Kakarla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Vs. Income Tax Officer A-1, Janani Apartments Ward-1(2) Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Visakhapatnam Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ahbpk5319G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri I.Kama Sastry, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)]-1 Visakhapatnam

68,500/-. The immovable property was purchased by the co-owners for a consideration of Rs.24,00,000/- plus stamp duty and registration charges of Rs.5,14,795/- and registered vide document No.2910 of 2005 dated 24.06.2005. A notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) dated 13.03.2014 was issued by the Assessing Officer

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEPORIDE PHARMACEUTICALS, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERANAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERANAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS WELLHOPE AGRITECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NUTRIENT MARINE FOODS LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. GOLUGURI SRIRAMA REDDY, BHIMAVARAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. REAL GROW EXIMS PRIVATE LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed