Search: section 68

16 results for “section 68”+ Section 273clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 132(4)27 Section 153A13 Addition to Income13 Section 1329 Section 143(3)6 Limitation/Time-bar6 Deduction3 Section 143(2)2 Section 68

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NAGA HANUMAN SOLVENT OILS PRIVATE LIMITED., VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 32/VIZ/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.32/Viz/2020 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Naga Hanuman Solvent Oils Circle-3(1) Private Ltd., Visakhapatnam Sri Balaji Residency Sector-9, Mvp Colony Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaccn1547J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DRFor Respondent: Shri G.V.N.Hari, AR

Section 68

section 68 of the Act. As rightly observed by the Ld.CIT(A), the assessee has reduced the creditors and increased the share application money for the purpose of bank loans to project good financial condition of the company. Though the practice is unethical, there is no understatement of income or introduction of capital for which the source could

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NAGA HANUMAN SOLVENT OILS PRIVATE LIMITED., VISAKHAPATNAM

KOTU ANASUYA (LATE),VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NAGA HANUMAN SOLVENT OILS PRIVATE LIMITED., VISAKHAPATNAM

KOTU ANASUYA (LATE),VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

KOTU SARAT KUMAR,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DY.CIT., VISAKHAPATNAM

DY CIT, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. KOTU SARATH KUMAR`, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GUNTUR vs. BHARATHI CONSUMER CARE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, GUNTUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , GUNTUR vs. BHARATHI CONSUMER CARE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED, GUNTUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , GUNTUR vs. BHARATHI CONSUMER CARE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, GUNTUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE , GUNTUR vs. BHARATHI CONSUMER CARE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, GUNTUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GUNTUR vs. BHARATHI CONSUMER CARE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, GUNTUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , GUNTUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL, , GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUNTUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

BRANDIX APPARAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 5(1), VISAKHAPATNAM