PADMAVATHI GURUVU,SRIKAKULAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SRIKAKULAM
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 227/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam13 May 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.227/Viz/2024 (धनिाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2017-18) Padmavathi Guruvu, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Srikakulam. Ward-2, Pan: Abopg1523D Srikakulam. (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थीकीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri I. Kama Sastry, Ca प्रत्यार्थीकीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar
For Appellant: Shri I. Kama Sastry, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 129Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69A
68 of the Act.
3. The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, modify, delete any of the above grounds of appeal.”
4. Ground No.3 is general in nature and needs no adjudication.
5. Ground No. 1 relates to addition of Rs. 18,10,000/- by allowing a marginal relief of Rs. 7 lakhs