KANCHAN LALWANI,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

68 is illegal, invalid and bad in law; 6. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre erred in not considering that assessee has specifically objected the stamp duty value, therefore confirming addition made U/s. 56(2)(x)(b) * B of Rs. 45,40,70/- without referring matter to DVO on assumption and presumption basis is illegal

BANNAVATU TULASI ,KANCHIKACHERLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri K Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. 451/Viz/2024 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2015-16) Baanavatu Tulasi, Vs. Income Tax Officer, M.P.P. School, Kopthapet, Ward-1(1), Kanchikacherla, Vijayawada. Krishna-521180. Pan: Afcpt1634C (अपीलधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

68 taxmann.com 298 (Kerala) (2) Smt. Amina Ismil Rangari vs. ITO, ITA No. 6261/Mum/2013 (AY 2003-04), dated 15/09/2017 (Mumbai Tribunal) (3) M/s. Bhaval Synthetics (India) Limited vs. DCIT, ITA No.1043/JP/2019 (AY 2013-14), dated 28/10/2020 (Jaipur Tribunal) (4) Income Tax Officer vs. M/s. Shri Krishna Dutta Academy, ITA Nos. 565, 566 & 568/LKW/2011

ARABOLU VENKATA NAGA DEEPATHI REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, N. SATYARAMANUJAMM ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2010-11) Smt.Arabolu Venkata Naga Deepthi Vs. Income Tax Officer Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder (International Taxation) Smt. N.Satyaramanujam Visakhapatnam Flat No.403, Dhanna Apartments Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam [Pan : Atcpa6413A] (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

234A; 234B and 234C and the Id. CIT (Appeals) is not correct in confirming the levy/charge of interest. 3. The above grounds are mutually exclusive and without prejudice to one another. 4. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend, alter, modify, delete all or any of the above grounds appeal. 3. Brief facts of the case are that

VENKATA NARASIMHAM THOTA,KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, KAKINADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.207/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18) Venkata Narasimham Thota, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Veeravaram, Kirlampudi. Ward-2, Pan: Achpt2895H Kakinada. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Boda Anand Kumar, Ca (Hybrid) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 27/11/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 05/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm:

234A, 234B and 234C totalling to Rs.6,59,933/- is not correct in the facts and circumstances of appellant's case. 5. For the above grounds and any other ground or grounds, that may be urged during the course of hearing of the appeal, the appellant humbly prays to allow the appeal with consequent re- lief in favour of appellant

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERANAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS WELLHOPE AGRITECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEPORIDE PHARMACEUTICALS, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. GOLUGURI SRIRAMA REDDY, BHIMAVARAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. REAL GROW EXIMS PRIVATE LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NEXUS FEEDS LIMITED, HYDERANAD

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16, 2016-17, 2017-18) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Feeds Limited, Tax, Central Circle-1, Flat No.82, Navanirman Nagar, Rajahmundry. Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. Pan: Aadcn 2786 N आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 94/Viz/2021 (Assessment Year : 2016-17) The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Nexus Well Hope Agritech Tax, Central Circle-1, International Limited, Rajahmundry. Plot No.101, D.No.8-1- 301/86/87, Sai Priya Residency, Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Pan: Aafcn 0930 L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mv Prasad, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit and added to the returned income for the AY 2011-12. Further, the Ld. AO also made an addition of Rs.76,47,000/- as unexplained share application money. Thus, the assessed income was determined at Rs. 6,10,93,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , RAJAHMUNDRY vs. NUTRIENT MARINE FOODS LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

68 of the Act being the unexplained cash deposits made during the impugned assessment year and added it to the income returned by the assessee for the AY 2015-16. Accordingly, the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,50,00,000/- against the NIL income returned by the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed

JIYYANA VENKATRAYUDU,KAKINADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.138/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Jiyyana Venkatrayudu, Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Kakinada. Income Tax, Pan: Axppj 2351 K Circle-1, Kakinada. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 14/06/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 10/08/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

68 are not applicable to the case of the appellant. 4. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in invoking the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act and levying tax at higher rate of 60%. 5. The Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the levy

KAKRLA SURYA GANGADHAR TILAK,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.177/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Smt.Kakarla Guna Vidya Saraswathi Vs. Income Tax Officer C/O Kakrla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Ward-3(3) A-1, Janani Apartments Visakhapatnam Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Apjpk5999N] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Sri Kakarla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Vs. Income Tax Officer A-1, Janani Apartments Ward-1(2) Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Visakhapatnam Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ahbpk5319G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri I.Kama Sastry, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)]-1 Visakhapatnam

68,500/-. The immovable property was purchased by the co-owners for a consideration of Rs.24,00,000/- plus stamp duty and registration charges of Rs.5,14,795/- and registered vide document No.2910 of 2005 dated 24.06.2005. A notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) dated 13.03.2014 was issued by the Assessing Officer

KAKARLA GUNA VIDYA SARASWATHI,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.177/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Smt.Kakarla Guna Vidya Saraswathi Vs. Income Tax Officer C/O Kakrla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Ward-3(3) A-1, Janani Apartments Visakhapatnam Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Apjpk5999N] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08) Sri Kakarla Surya Gangadhar Tilak Vs. Income Tax Officer A-1, Janani Apartments Ward-1(2) Pandurangaswamy Temple Backside Visakhapatnam Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ahbpk5319G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri I.Kama Sastry, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)]-1 Visakhapatnam

68,500/-. The immovable property was purchased by the co-owners for a consideration of Rs.24,00,000/- plus stamp duty and registration charges of Rs.5,14,795/- and registered vide document No.2910 of 2005 dated 24.06.2005. A notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) dated 13.03.2014 was issued by the Assessing Officer