DONKALA CHENCHU NARASIMHA RAO,NELLORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

133A", "148", "131(1)", "115BBE" ], "issues": "Whether the addition made as on-money payment for property purchase under Section 69 is sustainable, and whether cash loans treated as unexplained cash credits under Section 68

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ALFA ELECTRONIC SERVICES(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos. 50, 51 & 53/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. M/S. Alfa Electronic Services (India) Prathyakshakar Bhavan, Sector – 8 Private Limited Mvp Double Road, 49-22-5, Sri Sai Mansions Visakhapatnam – 530017 Lalitha Nagar, Visakhapatnam – 530016 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aahca3583E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 15.12.2015 and during the course of survey the Managing Director of the assessee-company was asked to prove the genuineness of three sub-contractors Page No. 2 I.T.A.Nos.50, 51 & 53/VIZ/2021 M/s. Alfa Electronic Services (India) Private Limited whom the assessee engaged in the impugned

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ALFA ELECTRONIC SERVICES(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPTNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos. 50, 51 & 53/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. M/S. Alfa Electronic Services (India) Prathyakshakar Bhavan, Sector – 8 Private Limited Mvp Double Road, 49-22-5, Sri Sai Mansions Visakhapatnam – 530017 Lalitha Nagar, Visakhapatnam – 530016 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aahca3583E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 15.12.2015 and during the course of survey the Managing Director of the assessee-company was asked to prove the genuineness of three sub-contractors Page No. 2 I.T.A.Nos.50, 51 & 53/VIZ/2021 M/s. Alfa Electronic Services (India) Private Limited whom the assessee engaged in the impugned

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ALFA ELECTRONIC SERVICES(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPTNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos. 50, 51 & 53/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. M/S. Alfa Electronic Services (India) Prathyakshakar Bhavan, Sector – 8 Private Limited Mvp Double Road, 49-22-5, Sri Sai Mansions Visakhapatnam – 530017 Lalitha Nagar, Visakhapatnam – 530016 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aahca3583E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 15.12.2015 and during the course of survey the Managing Director of the assessee-company was asked to prove the genuineness of three sub-contractors Page No. 2 I.T.A.Nos.50, 51 & 53/VIZ/2021 M/s. Alfa Electronic Services (India) Private Limited whom the assessee engaged in the impugned

SRI RAJANI GOLD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.162/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Sri Rajani Gold V. Asst. Cit – Circle – 1(1) D.No. 11-49-336B Central Revenue Building Sivalayam Street, I Town Mg Road – 520001 Vijayawada – 520001 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacfs6675E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

133A of the Act. Statements are also recorded on 23.11.2016 and 29.12.2016. Page No. 3 I.T.A. No. 162/VIZ/2023 Sri Rajani Gold 5. The Ld.AO noticed from the statements recorded that the assessee accepted demonetized currency from the public by making sale of gold bullion. The assessee submitted that the amounts deposited in banks are out of advances received for sale

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT LTD, GUNTUR

133A", "147", "148", "132(1)", "132(4)", "142(1)", "Section 68", "Section 69C" ], "issues": "The primary issue was the estimation

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay in the case

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay in the case

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay in the case

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay in the case

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD., GUNTUR

133A of the Act for the 15 premises.\nDuring the course of search proceedings, the search team noticed that assessee\ngenerated unaccounted income by way of production suppression of eggs and the\nPage No. 3\nITA Nos. 228, 229, 230 & 231/VIZ/2025\nC.O. Nos. 19, 20, 21 & 22/VIZ/2025\nVenkatrama Poultries Pvt Ltd.,\nsame are sold outside the books of accounts

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 148, the previous under assessment stands set aside and the AO has not only the jurisdiction but is also duty bound to levy tax on the entire income which has escaped assessment during the course of original assessment. In the case of CWT vs. D.R. Wadera Lit-I of HansrajWadera, reported in (2000) 163 CTR 251 (Delhi

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 148, the previous under assessment stands set aside and the AO has not only the jurisdiction but is also duty bound to levy tax on the entire income which has escaped assessment during the course of original assessment. In the case of CWT vs. D.R. Wadera Lit-I of HansrajWadera, reported in (2000) 163 CTR 251 (Delhi

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD., GUNTUR

133A of the Act for the 15 premises.\nDuring the course of search proceedings, the search team noticed that assessee\ngenerated unaccounted income by way of production suppression of eggs and the\nPage No. 3\nITA Nos. 228, 229, 230 & 231/VIZ/2025\nC.O. Nos. 19, 20, 21 & 22/VIZ/2025\nVenkatrama Poultries Pvt Ltd.,\nsame are sold outside the books of accounts

TADISETTI MURALI MOHAN,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133A of the Act. The case was selected for complete scrutiny and the assessment was completed U/s. 143(3) on 27/3/2015 determining the total income at Rs. 8,11,90,000/-. Subsequently, on verification of balance sheet for the AY 2012-13 and AY 2011-12, the Ld. AO found that there is an increase

TADISETTI MURALI MOHAN,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133A of the Act. The case was selected for complete scrutiny and the assessment was completed U/s. 143(3) on 27/3/2015 determining the total income at Rs. 8,11,90,000/-. Subsequently, on verification of balance sheet for the AY 2012-13 and AY 2011-12, the Ld. AO found that there is an increase

TADISETTI MURALI MOHAN,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133A of the Act. The case was selected for complete scrutiny and the assessment was completed U/s. 143(3) on 27/3/2015 determining the total income at Rs. 8,11,90,000/-. Subsequently, on verification of balance sheet for the AY 2012-13 and AY 2011-12, the Ld. AO found that there is an increase

TADISETTI MURALI MOHAN,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133A of the Act. The case was selected for complete scrutiny and the assessment was completed U/s. 143(3) on 27/3/2015 determining the total income at Rs. 8,11,90,000/-. Subsequently, on verification of balance sheet for the AY 2012-13 and AY 2011-12, the Ld. AO found that there is an increase