BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 11A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai38Delhi29Bangalore14SC13Ahmedabad13Lucknow11Kolkata8Cochin7Jaipur7Karnataka7Nagpur5Indore5Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Hyderabad2Telangana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 80I13Section 69A6Section 1432Section 802Cash Deposit2Demonetization2Deduction2Addition to Income2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RAMAKRISHNA NUKALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, C.O.s, filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 412/VIZ/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Feb 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: \nDr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 143Section 69ASection 80Section 80I

11A) is hereby deleted.\nISSUE NO.2\n21 Issue no.2 is with respect to the addition of cash deposits during\nthe demonetization period u/s 69A of the Act of Rs.1,68,54,000/-.\n22. Before us, the ld.DR submitted that the Assessing Officer had\nmade the addition of Rs. 1,68,54,000/- under Section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SHRI RAMAKRISHNA NUKALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 252/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri S. Balakrishnan

For Appellant: Shri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 143Section 69ASection 80Section 80I

11A) is hereby deleted. ISSUE NO.2 21 Issue no.2 is with respect to the addition of cash deposits during the demonetization period u/s 69A of the Act of Rs.1,68,54,000/-. 22. Before us, the ld.DR submitted that the Assessing Officer had made the addition of Rs. 1,68,54,000/- under Section