THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIZIANAGARAM
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical
ITA 119/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Aug 2023AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.119/Viz/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2018-19) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Linton Projects Pvt. Ltd., Tax, Central Circle-2 D.No. 16-5-23, Visakhapatnam. Yelugubantivari Veedhi, Vizianagaram. Pan: Aabcl 6461 E (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) C.O. No.14/Viz/2023 (In आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.119/Viz/2021) ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2018-19) M/S. Linton Projects Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of D.No. 16-5-23, Yelugubantivari Income Tax, Central Circle-2 Veedhi, Vizianagaram. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aabcl 6461 E (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri C. Subrahmantyam, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr
For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmantyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68
115 BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thus, the total income of
the assessee was determined at Rs. 93,55,868/- and tax demand
of Rs. 87,45,160/- was raised by the Ld. AO. Aggrieved by the
order of the Ld. AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal
before the Ld. CIT(A).
3. On appeal