BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 129clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi337Mumbai198Bangalore134Jaipur92Chennai79Ahmedabad79Raipur44Indore42Pune37Kolkata29Rajkot26Lucknow22Telangana22Cuttack20Guwahati19Jodhpur18Amritsar16Nagpur14Chandigarh14Surat11Visakhapatnam7Hyderabad6Patna6Karnataka5Allahabad4Cochin4Kerala3Agra2Varanasi2Orissa2Panaji1Uttarakhand1SC1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14723Section 143(3)21Section 13215Section 153C15Section 133A10Section 1489Addition to Income7Section 132(4)5Search & Seizure

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), VIJAYAWADA vs. SREELAKSHMI MUSUNURU, PENAMALURU

ITA 278/VIZ/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.278/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sreelakshmi Musunuru, Ward-2(3), Penamaluru. Vijayawada. Pan: Aojpm4884K (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 149(1)(b)Section 69

129 to 131 of APB), vide her letter dated 23.11.2015 filed with the A.O in the course of the original assessment proceedings, disclosed all the primary facts regarding the purchase of agricultural land at Gangur (Page 133- 135 of APB), she was not required to give any further assistance to the AO by disclosure of other facts. Rather

5
Survey u/s 133A5
Section 692

SURYANARAYANA VANGAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. THE DYCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 344/VIZ/2017[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Samuel Nagadeshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153C

129, 133 & 134/2015- 16/CIT(A)-3/VSP/2017-18 dated 19.4.2017 for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed-off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. A search and seizure operation was conducted u/s

GODDI KANNA RAO,HYDERABAD vs. THE DYCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 347/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Samuel Nagadeshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153C

129, 133 & 134/2015- 16/CIT(A)-3/VSP/2017-18 dated 19.4.2017 for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed-off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. A search and seizure operation was conducted u/s

GODDI KANNA RAO,HYDERABAD vs. THE DYCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 348/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Samuel Nagadeshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153C

129, 133 & 134/2015- 16/CIT(A)-3/VSP/2017-18 dated 19.4.2017 for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed-off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. A search and seizure operation was conducted u/s

SURYANARAYANA VANGAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. THE DYCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 345/VIZ/2017[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Samuel Nagadeshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153C

129, 133 & 134/2015- 16/CIT(A)-3/VSP/2017-18 dated 19.4.2017 for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed-off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. A search and seizure operation was conducted u/s

SURYANARAYANA VANGAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. THE DYCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 346/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Samuel Nagadeshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153C

129, 133 & 134/2015- 16/CIT(A)-3/VSP/2017-18 dated 19.4.2017 for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed-off by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. A search and seizure operation was conducted u/s

VENUGOPAL NIMMAGADDA,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 212/VIZ/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.212/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-13) Venugopal Nimmagadda Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.21-10-29, Flat No.101 Ward-3(3) Anu Heights, 2Nd Lane Vijayawada Srinagar Colony Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada [Pan : Adapn2791A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri N.Madhusudhan, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Aparna Villuri, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 on 13.12.2019, disallowing the interest on fish tank loans of Rs.6,29,129/- holding that the same was not an allowable expenditure and assessed the total income at Rs.4,19,88,729/-. 3. On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the addition made