GATTULA LAKSHMI MADHAVI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.385, 386 & 387/Viz/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi, Vs. Assistant Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Of Income Tax, Pan: Agfpg8929H Central Circle-1, Visakhapatnam. (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate (Hybrid) राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 15/10/2025 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 10/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per Ravish Sood, Jm: The Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Respective Orders Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam-3, Dated 21/03/2025, 24/03/2025 & 16/04/2025, Which In Turn Arises From The Respective Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “Ao”) Under Section 147 Of The Income Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi Vs. Acit Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, "The Act”), Dated 27/03/2023; Under Section 271Aac(1) Of The Act, Dated 21/08/2023; & Under Section 270A Of The Act, Dated 21/08/2023 For Assessment Year 2018-19. As The Facts Involved In The Captioned Appeals Are Inextricably Interwoven, Therefore, The Same Are Being Taken Up & Disposed Of Vide A Consolidated Order.

48,53,826/- (as was disclosed by the assessee) and determined her business income at Rs. 11,88,306/- instead of Rs. 9,35,786/- that was admitted by her. Although it was the claim of the assessee that, as she had received the Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi vs. ACIT gross receipts through online mode, therefore, her income under section 44AD

GATTULA LAKSHMI MADHAVI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.385, 386 & 387/Viz/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi, Vs. Assistant Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Of Income Tax, Pan: Agfpg8929H Central Circle-1, Visakhapatnam. (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate (Hybrid) राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 15/10/2025 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 10/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per Ravish Sood, Jm: The Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Respective Orders Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam-3, Dated 21/03/2025, 24/03/2025 & 16/04/2025, Which In Turn Arises From The Respective Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “Ao”) Under Section 147 Of The Income Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi Vs. Acit Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, "The Act”), Dated 27/03/2023; Under Section 271Aac(1) Of The Act, Dated 21/08/2023; & Under Section 270A Of The Act, Dated 21/08/2023 For Assessment Year 2018-19. As The Facts Involved In The Captioned Appeals Are Inextricably Interwoven, Therefore, The Same Are Being Taken Up & Disposed Of Vide A Consolidated Order.

48,53,826/- (as was disclosed by the assessee) and determined her business income at Rs. 11,88,306/- instead of Rs. 9,35,786/- that was admitted by her. Although it was the claim of the assessee that, as she had received the Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi vs. ACIT gross receipts through online mode, therefore, her income under section 44AD

GATTULA LAKSHMI MADHAVI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.385, 386 & 387/Viz/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi, Vs. Assistant Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Of Income Tax, Pan: Agfpg8929H Central Circle-1, Visakhapatnam. (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate (Hybrid) राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 15/10/2025 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 10/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per Ravish Sood, Jm: The Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Respective Orders Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam-3, Dated 21/03/2025, 24/03/2025 & 16/04/2025, Which In Turn Arises From The Respective Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “Ao”) Under Section 147 Of The Income Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi Vs. Acit Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, "The Act”), Dated 27/03/2023; Under Section 271Aac(1) Of The Act, Dated 21/08/2023; & Under Section 270A Of The Act, Dated 21/08/2023 For Assessment Year 2018-19. As The Facts Involved In The Captioned Appeals Are Inextricably Interwoven, Therefore, The Same Are Being Taken Up & Disposed Of Vide A Consolidated Order.

48,53,826/- (as was disclosed by the assessee) and determined her business income at Rs. 11,88,306/- instead of Rs. 9,35,786/- that was admitted by her. Although it was the claim of the assessee that, as she had received the Gattula Lakshmi Madhavi vs. ACIT gross receipts through online mode, therefore, her income under section 44AD

SATYANARAYANA KODURU,KRISHNA DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GUDIWADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.491/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) Satyanarayana Koduru, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Krishna District. Ward-1, Pan:Altpk1048C Gudiwada. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 02/12/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 05/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm :

48,700/-; (iii) addition under section 69A of the Act of unexplained cash deposits in bank account: Rs.32,30,000/-; (iv) addition of undisclosed salary received from NHAI: Rs.17,62,155/-; (v) 4 Satyanarayana Koduru vs. ITO addition of bank interest: Rs.1,95,140/-; and (vi) addition in respect of credit entries: Rs.56,92,845/-. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. L V BEACH CITY PROPERTY PROMOTERS, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 254/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19) Asst. Cit – Central Circle – 2 V. L.V. Beach City Property Promoters 40-25-19/A, Balaji Towers 5Th Floor, Shiva Towers Kogantivari Street, Patamatalanka Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry-533103 Vijayawada – 520010 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacfl5214D] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) सी.ओ सं. / C.O. No. 3/Viz/2024 [आयकअपीलसं. से उत्पन्न / Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.254/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19)] L.V. Beach City Property Promoters V. Asst. Cit – Central Circle – 2 40-25-19/A, Balaji Towers 5Th Floor, Shiva Towers Kogantivari Street, Patamatalanka Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry-533103 Vijayawada – 520010 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacfl5214D] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व / Assessee Represented By : Shri M.V. Prasad, Ar राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व / Department Represented By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr)

48,55,834/- towards unaccounted income for the A.Y. 2018-19 in the case of the assessee. However, Assessing Officer noticed that while filing the return of income under section 153A of the Act the assessee firm has not disclosed the additional income consequent to search. Assessing Officer on verification of incriminating material seized, worked out the unaccounted income

VENKATA PRASAD PULIPATI,AMARAVATHI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.612/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) Venkata Prasad Pulipati, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Amaravathi. Ward-2(1), Pan: Asapp8796L Guntur. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri I. Kama Sastry, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 03/12/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 19/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

48. The proviso to Section 151 has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01.04.2023. The relevant Section 151 with its proviso is applicable to the case of the petitioner is quoted hereunder: 151. Sanction for issue of notice:- Specified authority for the purposes of Section 148 and Section 148A shall be,- (i) Principal Commissioner or Principal

ASHOK RUDRARAJU,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No. 439/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2016-17) Ashok Rudraraju, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-2(5), Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aqvpr4058L

48. The proviso to Section 151 has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01.04.2023. The relevant Section 151 with its proviso is applicable to the case of the petitioner is quoted hereunder: 30 Ashok Rudraraju vs. ITO 151. Sanction for issue of notice:- Specified authority for the purposes of Section 148 and Section 148A shall

INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. QUALITY STEEL SHOPPE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the Cross Objection No

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.454/Viz/2024 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Income Tax Officer, Vs. Quality Steel Shoppe Ward-2(1), Private Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaacq1115D (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 18/Viz/2024 (In आ.अपी.सं /454/Viz/2024) ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19)

48. The proviso to Section 151 has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01.04.2023. The relevant Section 151 with its proviso is applicable to the case of the petitioner is quoted hereunder: 151. Sanction for issue of notice:- Specified authority for the purposes of Section 148 and Section 148A shall be,- (i) Principal Commissioner or Principal

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VIZAG RE-BARS PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.428/Viz/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Dy. Cit – Circle – 3(1) Vs. M/S. Vizag Re-Bars Private Limited 35, 50-92-35, Sankara Matam Road Plot No. 1 Ida, Edulapaka Bonangi, Opposite Reliance Fresh Parawada Mandal – 531021 Beside Reliance Fresh, Near By Main Road Andhra Pradesh Madhuranagar, Dwaraka Nagar Visakhapatnam – 530016 [Pan:Aabcv2581M] Andhra Pradesh (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)

48,472/-. The assessee claimed the cost of acquisition for Rs.5,66,00,000/- paid as an advance to Krishnarama Industrial Investments Ltd (hereinafter referred as KRIIL) during the F.Y. 2007-08. 5. After considering the submissions of the assessee, the Ld. AO rejected the assessee contentions by observing that the assessee has not furnished any documentary evidences with respect

INCOME TAX OFFICER, TENALI vs. SURYAPRAKASARAO KANAPARTHY, BETHAPUDI, REPALLE

In the result, the Cross Objection filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations, while for the appeal filed by the revenue having been rendered as academic in nature, is ...

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.239/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19) Income Tax Officer, Vs. Suryaprakasarao Tenali. Kanaparthy, Bethapudi, Repalle, Bapatla. Pan: Dmqpk7509P (Appellant) (Respondent)

48. The proviso to Section 151 has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01.04.2023. The relevant Section 151 with its proviso is applicable to the case of the petitioner is quoted hereunder: 151. Sanction for issue of notice:- Specified authority for the purposes of Section 148 and Section 148A shall be,- (i) Principal Commissioner or Principal

UPPALAPADU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,UPPALAPADU, GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan Sआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.523/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19) Uppalapadu Primary Vs. Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Cooperative Ward-2(1), Society Limited, Guntur. Uppalapadu, Guntur. Pan: Aaaau4669G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती Shri R. Siva Rama Krishna, "ारा/Assessee By: Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 29/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 31/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Society Is Directed Against The Assessment Order Dated 25.01.2024 Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “Ao”) Under Section 147 Read With Sections 144 & 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, “The Act”) Dated 25.01.2024 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. The 2 Uppalapadu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited Vs. Ito

48. The proviso to Section 151 has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01.04.2023. The relevant Section 151 with its proviso is applicable to the case of the petitioner is quoted hereunder: 151. Sanction for issue of notice:- Specified authority for the purposes of Section 148 and Section 148A shall be,- (i) Principal Commissioner or Principal

POTHINA SATYANARAYANA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.568/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Pothina Satyanarayana, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-2(5), Pan: Ahdpp1312N Visakhapatnam. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 19/11/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 26/11/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm : The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, Dated 10/07/2025, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “Ao”) Under Section 147 R.W.S 144 R.W.S 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, “Act”), Dated 12/02/2024 For The Assessment Year 2018-19. The 2 Pothina Satyanarayana Vs. Ito

48. The proviso to Section 151 has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 with effect from 01.04.2023. The relevant Section 151 with its proviso is applicable to the case of the petitioner is quoted hereunder: 151. Sanction for issue of notice:- Specified authority for the purposes of Section 148 and Section 148A shall be,- (i) Principal Commissioner or Principal

GUNTUPALLI NAGESWARA RAO,IBRAHIMPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

reassessment notice is issued for less than Rs.50 lacks escaped income for the period beyond 3 years. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) NFAC erred both on facts and in law in upholding the disallowance of deductions under Chapter VIA of Rs.3,84,267/- made vide assessment order passed u/s.147 without appreciating the facts and the evidences. 4. Any other ground/grounds

GUNTUPALLI NAGESWARA RAO,IBRAHIMPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

reassessment notice is issued for less than Rs.50 lacks escaped income for the period beyond 3 years. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) NFAC erred both on facts and in law in upholding the disallowance of deductions under Chapter VIA of Rs.3,84,267/- made vide assessment order passed u/s.147 without appreciating the facts and the evidences. 4. Any other ground/grounds

BHAVANASI YELLA RAO vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.265, 266, 267 & 268/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: (2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Bhavanasi Yella Rao Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0307J] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.351/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit, Central Circle Bhavanasi Yella Rao Vijayawada Guntur (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Debakumar Sonowal, Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.01.2018 घोर्णा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19.01.2018

48,000/-. The assessee had disclosed Rs.1,00,000/- as additional income during the course of search on account of sale of land. For the relevant assessment year, the assessee became a partner in M/s. Balaji Developers which came into existence from 27.9.2006 and has introduced capital of Rs.4,00,000/- in this firm. The AO made the addition

BHAVANASI YELLA RAO vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.265, 266, 267 & 268/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: (2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Bhavanasi Yella Rao Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0307J] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.351/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit, Central Circle Bhavanasi Yella Rao Vijayawada Guntur (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Debakumar Sonowal, Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.01.2018 घोर्णा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19.01.2018

48,000/-. The assessee had disclosed Rs.1,00,000/- as additional income during the course of search on account of sale of land. For the relevant assessment year, the assessee became a partner in M/s. Balaji Developers which came into existence from 27.9.2006 and has introduced capital of Rs.4,00,000/- in this firm. The AO made the addition

BHAVANASI YELLA RAO vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.265, 266, 267 & 268/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: (2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Bhavanasi Yella Rao Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0307J] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.351/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit, Central Circle Bhavanasi Yella Rao Vijayawada Guntur (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Debakumar Sonowal, Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.01.2018 घोर्णा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19.01.2018

48,000/-. The assessee had disclosed Rs.1,00,000/- as additional income during the course of search on account of sale of land. For the relevant assessment year, the assessee became a partner in M/s. Balaji Developers which came into existence from 27.9.2006 and has introduced capital of Rs.4,00,000/- in this firm. The AO made the addition

BHAVANASI YELLA RAO vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.265, 266, 267 & 268/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: (2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Bhavanasi Yella Rao Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0307J] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.351/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit, Central Circle Bhavanasi Yella Rao Vijayawada Guntur (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Debakumar Sonowal, Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.01.2018 घोर्णा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19.01.2018

48,000/-. The assessee had disclosed Rs.1,00,000/- as additional income during the course of search on account of sale of land. For the relevant assessment year, the assessee became a partner in M/s. Balaji Developers which came into existence from 27.9.2006 and has introduced capital of Rs.4,00,000/- in this firm. The AO made the addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI BHAVANSI YELLA RAO, PIDUGURALLA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.265, 266, 267 & 268/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Years: (2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12) Bhavanasi Yella Rao Acit, Central Circle Guntur Vijayawada [Pan No.Acjpb0307J] (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.351/Vizag/2017 (धनधाारण िर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit, Central Circle Bhavanasi Yella Rao Vijayawada Guntur (अपीलाथी / Appellant) (प्रत्याथी / Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Debakumar Sonowal, Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.01.2018 घोर्णा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 19.01.2018

48,000/-. The assessee had disclosed Rs.1,00,000/- as additional income during the course of search on account of sale of land. For the relevant assessment year, the assessee became a partner in M/s. Balaji Developers which came into existence from 27.9.2006 and has introduced capital of Rs.4,00,000/- in this firm. The AO made the addition