BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 239clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi271Mumbai221Bangalore73Kolkata42Jaipur40Chennai34Ahmedabad26Chandigarh22Pune21Surat19Lucknow17Cochin15Hyderabad14Cuttack14Nagpur7Raipur6Visakhapatnam5Ranchi4Indore4Patna3Karnataka3Jodhpur3Rajkot2SC2Amritsar2Rajasthan1Panaji1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 3512Section 1476Section 143(3)5Section 1485Deduction5Section 35(1)4Section 35(3)4Reassessment4Section 143(2)2

THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 63/VIZ/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

reassessment proceedings - Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhanji Lavji (1971) 79 ITR 582 (SC). Having second thoughts on the same material, and omission to draw the correct legal presumption during original assessment do not warrant the initiation of a proceeding under section 147 - ITO Vs. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur (1974) 97 ITR 239

Section 142(1)2

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA vs. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED., VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 551/VIZ/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

reassessment proceedings - Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhanji Lavji (1971) 79 ITR 582 (SC). Having second thoughts on the same material, and omission to draw the correct legal presumption during original assessment do not warrant the initiation of a proceeding under section 147 - ITO Vs. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur (1974) 97 ITR 239

THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 62/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

reassessment proceedings - Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhanji Lavji (1971) 79 ITR 582 (SC). Having second thoughts on the same material, and omission to draw the correct legal presumption during original assessment do not warrant the initiation of a proceeding under section 147 - ITO Vs. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur (1974) 97 ITR 239

THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 61/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

reassessment proceedings - Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhanji Lavji (1971) 79 ITR 582 (SC). Having second thoughts on the same material, and omission to draw the correct legal presumption during original assessment do not warrant the initiation of a proceeding under section 147 - ITO Vs. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur (1974) 97 ITR 239

ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1),, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 394/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Oct 2019AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleandhra Pradesh Capital Vs. Acit, Circle-3(1), Region Development Authority Vijayawada. (Formerly Vgtm Urban Development Authority), Uda Complex, Lenin Centre, Governorpet, Vijayawada. Pan No. Aaalv 0067 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N. Murthy, Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 3

reassess the escapement of income after four years, the Assessing Officer has to establish that there is a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary to complete the assessment. In this case, the Assessing Officer has raised an objection in respect of sinking (A.P. Capital Region Development Authority) funds