BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi205Mumbai180Bangalore99Chennai62Jaipur61Chandigarh54Raipur34Kolkata34Ahmedabad24Pune17Patna13Nagpur13Hyderabad10Lucknow9Surat8Cochin7Cuttack6Indore5Visakhapatnam4Amritsar3Guwahati3Panaji1Rajkot1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 1476Section 1483Section 143(2)2Section 142(1)2Section 69A2Survey u/s 133A2Addition to Income2

VULLI RADHAKRISHNA,TUNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TUNI

ITA 359/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.359/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16) Vulli Radhakrishna, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Tuni. Ward-1, Pan: Aegpv1751H Tuni. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 04/12/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 19/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 17/03/2025, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short “A.O.”) Under Section 147 R.W.S 144 R.W.S 144B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short “The Act”) Dated 26/03/2022 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16. 2 Vulli Radhakrishna Vs. Ito

For Appellant: Shri GVN Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 69A

reassessment order in the present case under section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act, dated 26/02/2022, has been passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), Delhi, i.e., by the 5 Vulli Radhakrishna vs. ITO Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), therefore, the same is invalid and is liable to be struck down for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 137/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

195 (SC) N.Κ.\nProteins Ltd. (earlier N.K.Industries Ltd) Vs Dy.CIT vide SLP (C) No.769 of\n2017. The Hon'ble High Court held that "The Tribunal in the case of Vijay\nProteins Ltd (Supra) has observed that it would be just and proper to direct the\nAO to restrict the addition in respect of the undisclosed income relating

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

ITA 221/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

195 (SC) N.Κ.\nProteins Ltd. (earlier N.K.Industries Ltd) Vs Dy.CIT vide SLP (C) No.769 of\n2017. The Hon'ble High Court held that "The Tribunal in the case of Vijay\nProteins Ltd (Supra) has observed that it would be just and proper to direct the\nAO to restrict the addition in respect of the undisclosed income relating

AGRI GOLD FOODS AND FARM PRODUCTS LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

ITA 2000/HYD/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Us:

Section 143(3)

reassessment by the successor A.O. based on a “change of opinion” as against the view taken by his predecessor while framing the assessment vide his order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, dated 20.04.2009, was not sustainable in the eye of law and was liable to be vacated for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction; and (ii). that