VENUGOPAL NIMMAGADDA,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VIJAYAWADA
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 212/VIZ/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 May 2024AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.212/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-13) Venugopal Nimmagadda Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.21-10-29, Flat No.101 Ward-3(3) Anu Heights, 2Nd Lane Vijayawada Srinagar Colony Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada [Pan : Adapn2791A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri N.Madhusudhan, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Aparna Villuri, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250
section 147 of the Act have formulation and addition of Rs.6,29,129/- and as confirmed by the CIT(A) NFAC, DELHI may be VOID and hence the IMPUGNED
ORDER under Sec.250 may be NONEST IN LAW.
7. For the above reasons and other reasons which may be advanced during the course of hearing of the appeal, it is humbly
