Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 254(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 234E16 Section 1544 Section 2462 Section 200A2 Section 92B(1)2 Penalty2 TDS2 Rectification u/s 1542

GOVERNAMENT POLYTECHNIC,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 150/VIZ/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.149/Viz/2023 & 150/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Government Polytechnic Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds) Government Polytechnic College Ward-1 Kancharapalem Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaagg1122Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhukar Aves, DR

Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246

254 dated 21.12.2020, seeking waiver of late fee raised u/s 234E. But the Ld.ITO (TDS), Ward-1, Visakhapatnam vide letter dated 30.12.2020 rejected the petition filed by the assessee u/s 154, stating that there is no scope for waiver off of late fee u/s 234E. Therefore, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) against the letter issued

GOVERNAMENT POLYTECHNIC,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

GOVERNAMENT POLYTECHNIC,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

GOVERNAMENT POLYTECHNIC,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY