Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 144C(13)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi187 Mumbai133 Ahmedabad25 Bangalore23 Hyderabad18 Kolkata14 Jaipur12 Chennai9 Pune7 Visakhapatnam3 Rajkot3 Indore1 Raipur1 Dehradun1 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 92C4 Section 143(1)3 Section 143(2)3 Section 92E3 Section 92B(1)3 Section 133(6)2 Transfer Pricing2

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 473/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Smt. SuvibhaNolkha, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR

Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92CSection 92E

144C(13) of the Act. Aggrieved by the final assessment order of the Ld. AO, the assessee is in appeal before us. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO / TPO and the Hon’ble DRP erred in: TRANSFER PRICING MATTER: 1. Notional

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM