BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi427Mumbai258Karnataka121Bangalore55Ahmedabad40Jaipur34Raipur33Indore31Kolkata29Chennai18Visakhapatnam15Lucknow13Chandigarh12Dehradun7Surat6Guwahati5Pune5SC3Jodhpur2Hyderabad2Rajasthan1Panaji1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)4Section 1314Condonation of Delay4

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 474/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

permanent rolls and found it is convenient to engage the sub-contractors for handling and transportation of FFBs from various collection centers to the factory as collection centers are located at 9 different locations and it would be difficult for the company to coordinate with the transporters and to match the availability of vehicles as per the requirements. Therefore

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 475/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

permanent rolls and found it is convenient to engage the sub-contractors for handling and transportation of FFBs from various collection centers to the factory as collection centers are located at 9 different locations and it would be difficult for the company to coordinate with the transporters and to match the availability of vehicles as per the requirements. Therefore

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 415/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

permanent rolls and found it is convenient to engage the sub-contractors for handling and transportation of FFBs from various collection centers to the factory as collection centers are located at 9 different locations and it would be difficult for the company to coordinate with the transporters and to match the availability of vehicles as per the requirements. Therefore

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 416/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

permanent rolls and found it is convenient to engage the sub-contractors for handling and transportation of FFBs from various collection centers to the factory as collection centers are located at 9 different locations and it would be difficult for the company to coordinate with the transporters and to match the availability of vehicles as per the requirements. Therefore

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 236/VIZ/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 399/VIZ/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 397/VIZ/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 12/VIZ/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASST. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 325/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 235/VIZ/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 25/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 396/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 26/VIZ/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 49/VIZ/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, , VISAKHAPTNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

ITA 67/VIZ/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

271(1)© of the Act in respect of this amount. 8. The Ld. CIT ought to have appreciated that the above sum of Rs. 4,21,233/- pertains financial year 2008-09 in respect of which the appellant did not claim any exemption and such the provisions of section 14A are not at all applicable in respect of this amount