BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur154Mumbai107Delhi81Chandigarh69Bangalore55Hyderabad27Pune22Ahmedabad21Cochin21Indore21Agra19Rajkot18Amritsar16Chennai13Surat9Raipur9Cuttack5Varanasi5SC3Dehradun3Allahabad3Jodhpur2Visakhapatnam2Nagpur1Kolkata1Lucknow1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 69A3Section 56(2)(vii)2Addition to Income2

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NARSIMHARAJU KANUMURI, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 63/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Sept 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.63/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2017-18) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Kanumuri Narasimharaju Circle-3(1) 50-1-23/46, Flat No.202 Visakhapatnam Ksr Complex, C-Block Opp.Rytu Bazaar Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aerpk2717F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.40/Viz/2021 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.63/Viz/2021) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2017-18) Kanumuri Narasimharaju Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax 50-1-23/46, Flat No.202 Circle-3(1) Ksr Complex, C-Block Visakhapatnam Opp.Rytu Bazaar Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aerpk2717F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri B.Satyanarayana Raju, DR
Section 143(2)Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)Section 69A

house property and other sources apart from agricultural income. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 28.09.2018. The AO received information from investigation wing as per which the assessee is Managing Partner of M/s Kasyap Home Needs and has purchased 4500 sq.yards of land at Anadapuram from Shri Nalla Madhusudhan Reddy

THE ACIT,, GUNTUR vs. SAI BHASKAR IRONS LIMITED,, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 108/VIZ/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Feb 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अऩीऱ सं./I.T.A.No.108/Viz/2016 (ननधधारण वषा/Assessment Year:2012-13) Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S.Sai Bhaskar Circle-2(1), Guntur Irons Limited 3-1-3/A, 3Rd Lane Rajendra Nagar Guntur [Pan :Aamcs1675G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Deba K.Sonowala, Dr प्रत्यथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri I Kama Sastry, Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.02.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2018

For Appellant: Shri Deba K.Sonowala, DRFor Respondent: Shri I Kama Sastry, AR
Section 14Section 68

sections 69, 69A, 69B and 69C being treated separately, because such deemed income is not income from salary, house property