BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka586Mumbai421Delhi395Bangalore222Jaipur67Telangana52Calcutta51Ahmedabad28Kolkata27Hyderabad24Chennai24Cuttack23Chandigarh21Pune21Rajkot15Lucknow14Surat12SC10Indore9Varanasi7Nagpur6Cochin6Agra4Allahabad4Patna4Rajasthan3Visakhapatnam3Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Himachal Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1Raipur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 2638Section 105Section 143(3)5Section 1543Section 56(2)(x)3House Property3Section 32Capital Gains2Addition to Income

HARESH KUMAR LALWANI,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, VISHAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 264/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A. No.264/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2021-22) Haresh Kumar Lalwani V. Pr.Cit -1 22-1-22, Ambati Satram Junction Aayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens Vizianagaram – 535002 Visakhapatnam – 530020 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaqpt9248P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56(2)(x)Section 69A

260/ which includes long term capital gains of Rs. 8,19,153/- and income from house property of Rs. 3,26,665/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny in respect of cash deposits and purchase of immovable property and the Ld. AO has completed the assessment under section

2

SARNALA SAYABABU,GUNTUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), , GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the asseseee is allowed

ITA 98/VIZ/2021[2016-+17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 May 2022

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.98/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2016-17) Sarnala Sayababu, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Guntur. Ward-2(3), Pan: Aheps 0990 A Guntur. (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri GVN HariFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 3Section 5

house property & business filed his return of income declaring total income of Rs.8,08,260/- after claiming deduction under Chapter VIA. The return was processed U/s. 143(1) and thereafter the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS with the reasons whether investment and income relating to properties are duly disclosed. Accordingly statutory notice u/s 3 142(1) was issued

VIJAY PEMMARAJU,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOMR TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 126/VIZ/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 Nov 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.126/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2019-20) Vijay Pemmaraju Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.49-51-1A, Plot No.20 Ward-2(5) Flat No.303, Sankalp Paradise Visakhapatnam Santhipuram Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aempp5571M] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Y.Surya Chandra Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhukar Aves, DR
Section 1Section 10Section 154Section 2Section 3

house property and other sources, filed the return of income for the A.Y.2019-20, declaring an income of Rs.7,47,129/- after claiming a sum of Rs.9,22,260/- as exempt from income tax u/s 10(10AA) of the Act. The assessee has joined as a Technician in the Department of Telecom in the year 1981 under the Central Government