Search: house property

7 results for “house property”+ Section 216clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 132(4)12 Section 1326 Addition to Income6 Limitation/Time-bar6

CHALASANI VENKAT,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are dismissed

ITA 255/VIZ/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleito, Ward-2(2), Vs. Chalasani Venkat, Vijayawada. D.No. 40-10-2B, Pent House, Ramapriya Residency, Mogalrajapuram, Vijayawada. Pan No. Ahvpc 1673 P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam – FCAFor Respondent: Shri M.R. Bangari – Sr.DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

216/- in the trading account. The assessee was asked to furnish the details of loans taken for house property in CVR Chambers and also for business separately, and also details of interest payment on such loans separately. The assessee was also asked to furnish TDS deducted, if any on such interest payments. The assessee has submitted that there

CHALASANI VENKAT,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

CHALASANI VENKAT,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , GUNTUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL, , GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUTNUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, GUNTUR vs. ARUNACHALAM MANICKVEL,, GUTNUR